MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Honda » Jazz » 2010

Honda Jazz MOT Results

Registered in 2010
76.4% pass rate
from 22,578 tests in 2021
(39% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Honda Jazz is unusually good or bad.

  • 6.1% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (49% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim (19% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim (13% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.089% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (72% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Headlamps (42% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Headlamp (63% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.73% fail on Headlamp levelling device (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (22% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.71% fail on Direction indicators (66% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.71% fail on Flashing type (66% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.58% fail on Side repeaters (21% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Individual direction indicators (90% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0044% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.20% fail on Stop lamp (93% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Electrical equipment (49% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.0089% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.0089% fail on Horn (95% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (81% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Rear fog lamp (81% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Rear fog lamp (80% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.031% fail on Position lamps (73% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.022% fail on Position lamp (80% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0089% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.018% fail on Reversing lamps (93% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Reversing lamps (93% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.0089% fail on Rear reflectors (86% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.0044% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.0044% fail on Switch
  • 5.4% fail on Brakes (32% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Mechanical brake components (18% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Brake linings and pads (46% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.0% fail on Brake pads (46% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.018% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.89% fail on Brake discs and drums (22% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.89% fail on Brake discs (21% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (83% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0089% fail on Cable (88% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0044% fail on Linkage
        • 0.0044% fail on Clevis joint
    • 2.4% fail on Brake performance (40% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance (21% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt (20% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance (19% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.29% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.0044% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.0089% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.0044% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.0044% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.74% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (33% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.74% fail on Rbt (sp) (34% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.58% fail on Service brake imbalance (35% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.19% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.0089% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.0089% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.64% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (64% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.64% fail on Rbt (sp) (62% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Parking brake performance (84% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Rbt (83% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.11% fail on Parking brake performance (84% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.018% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (74% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.0044% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.066% fail on Brake performance not tested (52% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (47% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.093% fail on Pedal
      • 0.084% fail on Hand lever (57% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.093% fail on Parking brake control (74% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.093% fail on Lever (70% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.089% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (85% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.084% fail on Anti-lock braking system (82% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0044% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.044% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (66% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.013% fail on Hydraulic systems (85% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Brake fluid (79% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.0089% fail on Rigid brake pipes (99% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.0044% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 5.3% fail on Visibility
    • 3.9% fail on Wipers (54% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Washers (48% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.071% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.066% fail on Windscreen
      • 0.0044% fail on Window
    • 0.071% fail on View to rear (49% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.066% fail on Mirrors (51% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0044% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.0089% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.0089% fail on Bonnet (94% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 4.7% fail on Suspension (64% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.0% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (75% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.86% fail on Ball joint dust cover (71% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Linkage ball joints (49% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint (47% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.075% fail on Linkage (70% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (85% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0089% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.0044% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.58% fail on Springs (89% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Coil springs (89% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.58% fail on Coil spring (89% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Suspension arms (95% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Pins and bushes (92% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.040% fail on Ball joint dust cover (91% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.035% fail on Ball joint (98% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0044% fail on Suspension arm
    • 0.16% fail on Shock absorbers (81% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.058% fail on Wheel bearings (90% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.049% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.040% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.0044% fail on Suspension rod
      • 0.0044% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.013% fail on Other suspension component (94% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0089% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.0044% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.0089% fail on Sub-frames (96% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0044% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.0044% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.0044% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.0044% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  • 3.4% fail on Tyres (44% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Condition (40% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Tread depth (49% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.075% fail on Size/type (59% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.67% fail on Steering (72% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.61% fail on Steering linkage components (68% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Track rod end (68% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Ball joint (83% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.0044% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.0044% fail on Other components
        • 0.0044% fail on Steering linkage
    • 0.027% fail on Power steering (67% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.027% fail on Operation
    • 0.013% fail on Steering gear (96% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Steering rack (95% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.013% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.0089% fail on Electronic power steering
    • 0.0044% fail on Steering play
      • 0.0044% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.56% fail on Body, chassis, structure (86% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Exhaust system (92% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.080% fail on Transmission (95% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.080% fail on Drive shafts (95% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.075% fail on Joints (95% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0044% fail on Drive shaft
    • 0.062% fail on Fuel system (72% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.053% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (62% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0089% fail on Tank
    • 0.062% fail on Doors (67% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.049% fail on Door condition
      • 0.0089% fail on Front passenger's door (88% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0089% fail on Door condition (87% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0044% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.0044% fail on Pillar
    • 0.049% fail on Body
      • 0.031% fail on Other body component
      • 0.013% fail on Panel
      • 0.0044% fail on Body condition
    • 0.040% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.035% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.0044% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.0044% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 0.031% fail on Chassis
      • 0.031% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.031% fail on Bumpers (70% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.031% fail on Seats (61% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.027% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.0044% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.031% fail on Undertray
    • 0.027% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.027% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.013% fail on Load security (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Tailgate (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.013% fail on Tailgate condition (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.40% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (88% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.36% fail on Exhaust emissions (89% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Spark ignition (83% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Catalyst emissions (83% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (84% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.040% fail on Emissions not tested (88% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0044% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.0044% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.0044% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.018% fail on Compression ignition (99% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0089% fail on Emissions not tested (92% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0044% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.0044% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.027% fail on Fluid leaks (87% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.027% fail on Engine oil leaks (84% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.013% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.013% fail on Undertray
  • 0.38% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (58% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Seat belts (42% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Condition (47% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Requirements
      • 0.022% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.0089% fail on Attachment
    • 0.12% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (74% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.0044% fail on Airbags
      • 0.0044% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.25% fail on Identification of the vehicle (41% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Registration plates (41% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.17% fail on Road Wheels (63% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Attachment (54% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.013% fail on Condition (89% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.0044% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.0044% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review

  • Honda Jazz (2008 - 2015)
    Neatly styled. Increased room and better performance than original Jazz. better to drive. Very versatile. CVT-7 returned in February 2011 replacing i-SHIFT. More reliable than first generation Jazz.

    Search Good Garages