Ford Galaxy MOT Results

Registered in 1996

60.9% pass rate

from 46 tests in 2021

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Galaxy is unusually good or bad.

17% fail on Suspension
- 6.5% fail on Macpherson strut (35 times worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 4.3% fail on Pins and bushes (51 times worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 2.2% fail on Macpherson strut
- 6.5% fail on Anti-roll bars
  - 4.3% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (12 times worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 2.2% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 4.3% fail on Suspension arms
  - 4.3% fail on Pins and bushes
- 2.2% fail on Wheel bearings
- 2.2% fail on Shock absorbers
- 2.2% fail on Sub-frames
  - 2.2% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 2.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
15% fail on Brakes
- 11% fail on Brake performance
  - 8.7% fail on Parking brake performance (7 times worse than other 1996 cars)
    - 8.7% fail on Rbt (7 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      - 6.5% fail on Parking brake performance (6 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      - 2.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
  - 8.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
    - 8.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
  - 2.2% fail on Service brake performance
    - 2.2% fail on Rbt
      - 2.2% fail on Service brake performance
      - 2.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
  - 2.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 2.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 2.2% fail on Service brake performance
      - 2.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 4.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 4.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 2.2% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 2.2% fail on Brake pads
  - 2.2% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 2.2% fail on Brake discs
  - 2.2% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
    - 2.2% fail on Cable
- 2.2% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
  - 2.2% fail on Pedal
13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 4.3% fail on Headlamps
  - 4.3% fail on Headlamp
- 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
- 2.2% fail on Direction indicators
  - 2.2% fail on Flashing type
    - 2.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 2.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 2.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 2.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 2.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
11% fail on Body, chassis, structure
- 4.3% fail on Exhaust system
- 4.3% fail on Transmission
  - 4.3% fail on Drive shafts
    - 4.3% fail on Joints
- 2.2% fail on Seats
  - 2.2% fail on Driver's seat
8.7% fail on Steering
- 8.7% fail on Steering gear (6 times worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 8.7% fail on Steering rack (7 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Power steering
  - 2.2% fail on Other components
8.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 4.3% fail on Seat belts
  - 2.2% fail on Prescribed areas
  - 2.2% fail on Attachment
  - 2.2% fail on Condition
- 4.3% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (5 times worse than other 1996 cars)
8.7% fail on Tyres
- 6.5% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Tread depth
6.5% fail on Visibility
- 6.5% fail on Wipers
6.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 6.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 4.3% fail on Spark ignition
    - 2.2% fail on Non catalyst emissions
    - 2.2% fail on Catalyst emissions
  - 2.2% fail on Compression ignition
    - 2.2% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo