MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Ford » Fusion » 2005

Ford Fusion MOT Results

Registered in 2005
57.3% pass rate
from 6,879 tests in 2021
(6.0% better than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Fusion is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (14% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 8.4% fail on Stop lamp (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.7% fail on Headlamp (14% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.2% fail on Individual direction indicators (26% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.044% fail on Side repeaters (95% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim (36% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim (40% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.8% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (72% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (73% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (73% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.48% fail on Rear reflectors (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.36% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (84% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Electrical equipment (79% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Horn (65% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.015% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.044% fail on Position lamps (76% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Position lamp (75% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.044% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.044% fail on Switch
    • 0.015% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.015% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 0.015% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.015% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 13% fail on Suspension (25% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Suspension arms (35% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Pins and bushes (79% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Ball joint (79% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Suspension arm
    • 3.1% fail on Springs (33% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Coil springs (32% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 3.1% fail on Coil spring (32% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.029% fail on Mounting
    • 2.5% fail on Wheel bearings (76% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Anti-roll bars (60% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.93% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (44% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Ball joint dust cover (42% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Linkage ball joints (74% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Ball joint (53% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Linkage (67% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.058% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.029% fail on Pins and bushes (89% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.029% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (92% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers (51% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.87% fail on Axles (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.87% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (77% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.16% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.044% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.015% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.35% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.16% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.13% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.058% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.25% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.17% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.029% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.015% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.015% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.015% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.029% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.029% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 12% fail on Brakes (11% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 7.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Brake performance (54% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (59% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (57% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.015% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance (62% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (61% better than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.89% fail on Service brake performance (65% better than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.23% fail on Service brake imbalance (59% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.015% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.015% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.73% fail on Parking brake performance (55% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.71% fail on Rbt (53% better than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.67% fail on Parking brake performance (50% better than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.044% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.015% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.015% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.60% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (37% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.60% fail on Rbt (sp) (35% better than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.39% fail on Service brake imbalance (46% better than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.25% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.41% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.3% fail on Mechanical brake components (59% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.77% fail on Brake linings and pads (63% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.77% fail on Brake pads (63% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Brake discs and drums (56% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.51% fail on Brake discs (58% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.029% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.12% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.12% fail on Cable
    • 0.84% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (42% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.84% fail on Anti-lock braking system (30% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.32% fail on Lever
    • 0.28% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.15% fail on Pedal
      • 0.13% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.23% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.22% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.12% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.087% fail on Valves (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.029% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.13% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.10% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
      • 0.029% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (82% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.044% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.029% fail on Other components
      • 0.015% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.015% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
    • 0.015% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.015% fail on Servos
  • 7.4% fail on Visibility
    • 5.0% fail on Wipers (32% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Washers (27% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on View to rear
      • 0.20% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.087% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.087% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.029% fail on Bonnet (86% better than other 2005 cars)
  • 6.0% fail on Body, chassis, structure (28% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.2% fail on Transmission (39% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Drive shafts (38% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Joints (39% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.073% fail on Drive shaft
        • 0.015% fail on Bearing housing
      • 0.058% fail on Prop shafts (71% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.058% fail on Joints
      • 0.029% fail on Belts
    • 0.80% fail on Fuel system (72% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.073% fail on Pipe
      • 0.044% fail on Tank
      • 0.029% fail on System
      • 0.015% fail on Hose
    • 0.17% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.17% fail on Body
      • 0.12% fail on Other body component
      • 0.058% fail on Panel
    • 0.17% fail on Seats
      • 0.10% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.073% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.15% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.15% fail on Engine mounting condition (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Doors (80% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.087% fail on Other passenger's door (64% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.087% fail on Door condition (64% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.015% fail on Door condition
    • 0.073% fail on Integral vehicle structure (89% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.073% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (89% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.058% fail on Chassis (84% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.058% fail on Chassis condition (84% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.015% fail on Cabs
      • 0.015% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.015% fail on Passenger compartment
  • 5.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (20% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Exhaust emissions (19% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 2.0% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.51% fail on Emissions not tested (36% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.015% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.71% fail on Compression ignition (49% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.28% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (61% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.16% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (58% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.073% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.015% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.015% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.015% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
    • 0.31% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.22% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.044% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
      • 0.029% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.015% fail on Other leaks
  • 5.2% fail on Tyres (20% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Tread depth (20% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Condition (28% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on Size/type
  • 2.7% fail on Steering (30% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Steering linkage components (22% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.044% fail on Ball joint (74% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.029% fail on Other components
        • 0.029% fail on Steering linkage
    • 0.28% fail on Power steering
      • 0.17% fail on Other components
      • 0.10% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.029% fail on Operation
    • 0.26% fail on Steering gear (63% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Steering rack (62% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.029% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.029% fail on Universal joint
  • 0.65% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (77% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.58% fail on Seat belts (58% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Condition
      • 0.044% fail on Prescribed areas (95% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.029% fail on Requirements
    • 0.073% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (95% better than other 2005 cars)
  • 0.29% fail on Identification of the vehicle (56% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Registration plates (56% better than other 2005 cars)
  • 0.28% fail on Road Wheels (44% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Attachment (58% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Condition
  • 0.015% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.015% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review

  • Ford Fusion (2002 - 2012)
    Versatile interior. Easy to get in and out of. Reasonably sized load area with no lip. Four-star crash test rating, economical TDCI diesels.

    Search Good Garages