FIAT Seicento MOT Results

Registered in 2002
51.5% pass rate
from 686 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT Seicento is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Brakes (81% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 19% fail on Brake performance (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 9.0% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 9.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 5.5% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 4.1% fail on Service brake performance (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 8.9% fail on Service brake performance (180% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 8.7% fail on Rbt (190% worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 7.7% fail on Service brake performance (200% worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 1.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.15% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.15% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 8.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 8.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.5% fail on Rbt
          • 2.2% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.29% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.29% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 9.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes (170% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.2% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.2% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.58% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.58% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.29% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.15% fail on Lever
        • 0.15% fail on Linkage
    • 0.58% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.58% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.44% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.44% fail on Lever
    • 0.29% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.29% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (81% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.15% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.15% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.15% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.15% fail on Other components
  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 9.5% fail on Headlamp aim (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 9.2% fail on Headlamp aim (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 5.7% fail on Direction indicators (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 5.7% fail on Flashing type (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 3.8% fail on Individual direction indicators (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Side repeaters (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.44% fail on All direction indicators
      • 0.15% fail on Semaphore
        • 0.15% fail on Switch
    • 3.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.4% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.58% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.15% fail on Dipswitch
    • 1.3% fail on Stop lamp (73% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.73% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (67% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.73% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.29% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.29% fail on Horn
      • 0.15% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.44% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.44% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.44% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.29% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.29% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.29% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.29% fail on Switch
    • 0.15% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 14% fail on Suspension
    • 5.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 4.5% fail on Springs
      • 4.5% fail on Coil springs
        • 4.5% fail on Coil spring
    • 3.2% fail on Suspension arms (42% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.73% fail on Ball joint (68% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.29% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.29% fail on Pins and bushes (87% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.87% fail on Anti-roll bars (81% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.15% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.15% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.73% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.44% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.29% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.15% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.15% fail on Axles
      • 0.15% fail on Axle
    • 0.15% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.15% fail on Other suspension component
  • 12% fail on Visibility (45% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 6.9% fail on Washers (91% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on Wipers
    • 0.15% fail on View to rear
      • 0.15% fail on Mirrors
  • 12% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 5.0% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.4% fail on Transmission
      • 3.4% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.2% fail on Joints
        • 0.15% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.29% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.29% fail on Joints
    • 1.2% fail on Chassis
      • 1.2% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.0% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.58% fail on Tank (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Hose
      • 0.15% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.15% fail on System
    • 0.73% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.73% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.44% fail on Seats
      • 0.44% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.29% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.15% fail on Towbar
      • 0.15% fail on Towbar condition
    • 0.15% fail on Body
      • 0.15% fail on Other body component
    • 0.15% fail on Doors
      • 0.15% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.15% fail on Door condition
    • 0.15% fail on Cabs
      • 0.15% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 6.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 5.4% fail on Spark ignition
        • 3.8% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.87% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.15% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.15% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 1.2% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.87% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.29% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.15% fail on Transmission oil leaks
    • 0.15% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.15% fail on Undertray
  • 4.4% fail on Tyres
    • 2.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.9% fail on Condition
    • 0.58% fail on Size/type
  • 3.2% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.8% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.29% fail on Condition
      • 0.15% fail on Requirements
    • 0.44% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 2.3% fail on Steering
    • 1.7% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.7% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.58% fail on Steering linkage components (80% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Track rod end (77% better than other 2002 cars)
  • 0.29% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.29% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.29% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.29% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages