MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » FIAT » Multipla » 2009

FIAT Multipla MOT Results

Registered in 2009
41.7% pass rate
from 144 tests in 2021
(58% worse than other 2009 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT Multipla is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Suspension (80% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 9.7% fail on Anti-roll bars (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 2.8% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 2.1% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.69% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.69% fail on Linkage
    • 9.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 8.3% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.69% fail on Ball joint
    • 6.3% fail on Springs
      • 4.9% fail on Coil springs
        • 4.2% fail on Coil spring
        • 0.69% fail on Mounting
      • 1.4% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (46 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 2.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.69% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.69% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.69% fail on Wheel bearings
  • 19% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 7.6% fail on Stop lamp (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.8% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.4% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.69% fail on All direction indicators
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.5% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.69% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.69% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.69% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.69% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 15% fail on Body, chassis, structure (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.3% fail on Exhaust system (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Transmission
      • 4.9% fail on Drive shafts
        • 4.2% fail on Joints
        • 0.69% fail on Drive shaft
    • 2.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure (18 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (23 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Fuel system (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Pipe (44 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.69% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 1.4% fail on Bumpers (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.69% fail on Chassis
      • 0.69% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.69% fail on Doors
      • 0.69% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.69% fail on Door condition
  • 13% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 13% fail on Exhaust emissions (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 6.9% fail on Compression ignition (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 3.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.8% fail on Emissions not tested (20 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.69% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
      • 5.6% fail on Spark ignition
        • 4.9% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.69% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 12% fail on Brakes
    • 6.9% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 4.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 2.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.1% fail on Rbt
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.69% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.69% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.69% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.4% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.69% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.69% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.69% fail on Rbt
          • 0.69% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 5.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.8% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 2.8% fail on Brake discs
      • 1.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.4% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Cable (14 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.69% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 10% fail on Tyres
    • 7.6% fail on Condition (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Tread depth
  • 8.3% fail on Visibility
    • 4.9% fail on Washers
    • 2.8% fail on Wipers
    • 0.69% fail on Bonnet
  • 4.2% fail on Steering
    • 3.5% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.8% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.69% fail on Other components
        • 0.69% fail on Steering linkage
    • 0.69% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.69% fail on Steering rack
  • 1.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.69% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.69% fail on Attachment
  • 0.69% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.69% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages