FIAT Bravo MOT Results

Registered in 2010
55.9% pass rate
from 880 tests in 2021
(25% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT Bravo is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Suspension (49% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 11% fail on Springs (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 11% fail on Coil springs (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 11% fail on Coil spring (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 7.4% fail on Suspension arms (80% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Ball joint (87% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Pins and bushes (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.5% fail on Anti-roll bars (58% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.34% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.34% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.11% fail on Linkage
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.1% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.57% fail on Axles (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.57% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.34% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.23% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.23% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.23% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.23% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 11% fail on Body, chassis, structure (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.4% fail on Exhaust system (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Transmission (80% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Drive shafts (88% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.8% fail on Joints (90% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.91% fail on Doors (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Driver's door (14 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.80% fail on Door condition (15 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.11% fail on Door condition
    • 0.68% fail on Engine mounting (18 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Engine mounting condition (26 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.45% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.23% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.11% fail on Tank
      • 0.11% fail on Pipe
    • 0.34% fail on Seats
      • 0.34% fail on Passenger's seat (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.23% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Bumpers
  • 11% fail on Brakes (35% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Mechanical brake components (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Brake linings and pads (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 4.4% fail on Brake pads (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Brake discs and drums (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.5% fail on Brake discs (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.57% fail on Cable (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.23% fail on Lever (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.11% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 2.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.3% fail on Rbt
          • 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.23% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.11% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.11% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt
          • 1.0% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.34% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.11% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.11% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.11% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.45% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.34% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.34% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.11% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.11% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.11% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.57% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.57% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.34% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.34% fail on Lever
    • 0.34% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.34% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.23% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.23% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.23% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.11% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 9.5% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 3.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.11% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.34% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.57% fail on Direction indicators (73% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Flashing type (73% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.57% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.57% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (71% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.34% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.34% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.23% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.23% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.23% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.11% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.11% fail on Horn
    • 0.11% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.11% fail on Position lamp
  • 7.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.6% fail on Exhaust emissions (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Spark ignition (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.7% fail on Catalyst emissions (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.80% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 2.4% fail on Compression ignition (90% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.57% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.23% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.11% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 0.45% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.23% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.11% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.11% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.11% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.11% fail on Undertray
  • 6.7% fail on Tyres
    • 3.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.23% fail on Size/type
  • 6.3% fail on Visibility
    • 3.3% fail on Wipers
    • 3.2% fail on Washers
    • 0.11% fail on Driver's view
  • 4.4% fail on Steering (87% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Steering linkage components (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Track rod end (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.23% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.11% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 0.68% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.68% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.34% fail on Condition
      • 0.23% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.11% fail on Requirements
  • 0.57% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.45% fail on Registration plates
    • 0.11% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.23% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.23% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

  • Fiat Bravo (2007 - 2014)
    Roomy cabin and big boot. Five-star Euro NCAP crash test rating. Excellent 1.4 T-Jet petrol. Strong MultiJet diesels.

    Search Good Garages