Daihatsu Sirion MOT Results

Registered in 2009
73.0% pass rate
from 1,031 tests in 2021
(31% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Daihatsu Sirion is unusually good or bad.

  • 10% fail on Suspension (30% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.5% fail on Linkage ball joints (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.97% fail on Ball joint (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Linkage
      • 0.097% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.097% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.097% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.097% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 4.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.4% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.58% fail on Pins and bushes (70% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.097% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.87% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.48% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.39% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.097% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.39% fail on Axles
      • 0.39% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.39% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.29% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.097% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.097% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.097% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.19% fail on Springs (97% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Coil springs (97% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Coil spring (97% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.097% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 6.7% fail on Brakes
    • 2.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Brake performance (54% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.97% fail on Service brake performance (60% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.87% fail on Rbt (64% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.78% fail on Service brake performance (63% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.097% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.097% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.097% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.97% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.97% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.58% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.58% fail on Rbt
          • 0.48% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.097% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.097% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.6% fail on Mechanical brake components (45% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.97% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.97% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.87% fail on Brake linings and pads (57% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.87% fail on Brake pads (57% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.48% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.48% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.39% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.39% fail on Pedal
    • 0.29% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.29% fail on Lever
  • 6.2% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (51% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.97% fail on Headlamp aim (69% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.87% fail on Headlamp aim (69% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.097% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.29% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (85% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.19% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.097% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.097% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.097% fail on Individual direction indicators
  • 5.6% fail on Visibility
    • 4.6% fail on Wipers (66% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Washers (62% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.097% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.097% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.097% fail on View to rear
      • 0.097% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.1% fail on Tyres (34% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.5% fail on Condition (51% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Size/type
  • 2.7% fail on Body, chassis, structure (42% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.87% fail on Transmission
      • 0.87% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.87% fail on Joints
    • 0.29% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.29% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.19% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.097% fail on Chassis
      • 0.097% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.097% fail on Body
      • 0.097% fail on Other body component
  • 2.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (49% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Exhaust emissions (51% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.3% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.39% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.29% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (76% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.097% fail on Non catalyst emissions
    • 0.19% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.097% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.097% fail on Other leaks
  • 0.78% fail on Steering (67% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Steering linkage components (80% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Track rod end (89% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.097% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.097% fail on Other components
        • 0.097% fail on Steering component
    • 0.29% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.29% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.097% fail on Steering play
      • 0.097% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.29% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (73% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.097% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.097% fail on Attachment
    • 0.097% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.19% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.19% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages