Citroen Grand C4 Picasso MOT Results

Registered in 2016
75.4% pass rate
from 3,467 tests in 2021
(55% worse than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen Grand C4 Picasso is unusually good or bad.

  • 8.2% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (130% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim (100% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim (89% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamps (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.66% fail on Direction indicators (83% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Flashing type (83% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.52% fail on Side repeaters (89% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.029% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.35% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.17% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.17% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.17% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.12% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.087% fail on Horn
      • 0.029% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.029% fail on Outline marker lamps
      • 0.029% fail on Outline marker lamp
  • 5.8% fail on Brakes (110% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Mechanical brake components (160% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Brake linings and pads (190% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 4.6% fail on Brake pads (190% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.95% fail on Brake discs and drums (99% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.95% fail on Brake discs (100% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.66% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.46% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.43% fail on Rbt
          • 0.40% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.029% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.029% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.029% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.12% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.12% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.087% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.20% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.20% fail on Pedal (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Hydraulic systems (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Brake fluid (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.029% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.087% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.087% fail on Electronic parking brake (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.087% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.087% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.058% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.058% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.029% fail on Electronic stability control
  • 5.1% fail on Tyres (31% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Condition (59% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.029% fail on Size/type
  • 4.9% fail on Suspension (140% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Anti-roll bars (17 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Linkage ball joints (34 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Ball joint (27 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (15 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Linkage (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint dust cover (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.84% fail on Suspension arms (70% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Ball joint (170% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.17% fail on Springs (85% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Coil springs (85% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on Coil spring (85% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.12% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.087% fail on Suspension rods (13 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.058% fail on Ball joint (42 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.029% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.029% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.029% fail on Ball joint
  • 3.1% fail on Visibility (23% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Washers (99% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.78% fail on Wipers (73% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.087% fail on View to rear
      • 0.087% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.058% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.058% fail on Windscreen
  • 1.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Transmission (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.95% fail on Drive shafts (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.92% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.029% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.087% fail on Prop shafts (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.087% fail on Joints (10 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.35% fail on Seats (14 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Driver's seat (14 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Passenger's seat (14 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.087% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.087% fail on Body
      • 0.087% fail on Other body component
    • 0.029% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.029% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.029% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.029% fail on Other boot lid component
  • 0.69% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (140% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.58% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.12% fail on Condition
  • 0.37% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (55% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Exhaust emissions (61% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.12% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.12% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.029% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
      • 0.058% fail on Spark ignition (88% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.058% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (80% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.058% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.058% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 0.32% fail on Steering
    • 0.29% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.29% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.029% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 0.32% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.32% fail on Attachment (130% worse than other 2016 cars)
  • 0.17% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.17% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages