MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Citroen » C4 Picasso » 2017

Citroen C4 Picasso MOT Results

Registered in 2017
85.3% pass rate
from 3,045 tests in 2021
(16% worse than other 2017 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen C4 Picasso is unusually good or bad.

  • 3.9% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (47% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.033% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamps (140% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp (180% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.62% fail on Direction indicators (150% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Flashing type (150% worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.53% fail on Side repeaters (190% worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.099% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.53% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (150% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.13% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.13% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.066% fail on Stop lamp (80% better than other 2017 cars)
  • 3.5% fail on Suspension (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Anti-roll bars (21 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Linkage ball joints (34 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Ball joint (27 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.066% fail on Anti-roll bar (36 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.066% fail on Linkage (5 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.033% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.033% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.36% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.20% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.066% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.033% fail on Springs
      • 0.033% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.033% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.033% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.033% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.033% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.033% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  • 3.5% fail on Tyres
    • 2.3% fail on Condition
    • 1.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.033% fail on Size/type
  • 3.2% fail on Brakes (54% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Mechanical brake components (54% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.8% fail on Brake pads (43% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Brake discs and drums (92% worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.66% fail on Brake discs (92% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.82% fail on Brake performance (71% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Service brake performance (110% worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.53% fail on Rbt
          • 0.53% fail on Service brake performance (130% worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.033% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.033% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.033% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.033% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.13% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.13% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.099% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.099% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.066% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.033% fail on Service brake performance
    • 0.26% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Pedal (9 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.099% fail on Hydraulic systems (5 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.099% fail on Brake fluid (10 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.033% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 2.0% fail on Visibility (46% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Washers (58% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Wipers (84% better than other 2017 cars)
  • 0.46% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.26% fail on Transmission (160% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Drive shafts (170% worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Joints (180% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.099% fail on Doors
      • 0.066% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.066% fail on Door condition
      • 0.033% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.033% fail on Door condition
    • 0.033% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.033% fail on Body
      • 0.033% fail on Other body component
    • 0.033% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.033% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 0.36% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 0.36% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.23% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.099% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.066% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.033% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.033% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.13% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.099% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.033% fail on Catalyst emissions
  • 0.23% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.13% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.099% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.099% fail on Condition
  • 0.13% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.13% fail on Attachment
  • 0.099% fail on Steering
    • 0.099% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.099% fail on Track rod end
  • 0.066% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.066% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages