Citroen C4 Cactus MOT Results

Registered in 2017
80.4% pass rate
from 5,911 tests in 2021
(55% worse than other 2017 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen C4 Cactus is unusually good or bad.

  • 9.5% fail on Visibility (160% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 7.1% fail on Wipers (160% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Washers (170% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.10% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.051% fail on Bonnet
  • 4.5% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (71% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim (74% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim (66% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Headlamps (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Headlamp (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.64% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.20% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.20% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.17% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.034% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.034% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.034% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.017% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.017% fail on Battery(ies)
  • 3.7% fail on Tyres
    • 2.1% fail on Tread depth (38% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.12% fail on Size/type
  • 2.6% fail on Body, chassis, structure (7 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Exhaust system (15 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Transmission (10 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Drive shafts (10 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Joints (10 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.068% fail on Prop shafts (11 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.068% fail on Joints (16 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Seats (10 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Passenger's seat (20 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.017% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.017% fail on Pipe
    • 0.017% fail on Body
      • 0.017% fail on Other body component
    • 0.017% fail on Undertray
  • 2.3% fail on Brakes
    • 1.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.3% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.017% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.61% fail on Brake discs and drums (78% worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.61% fail on Brake discs (78% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.64% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.36% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.36% fail on Rbt
          • 0.34% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.017% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.12% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.12% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.10% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.10% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.068% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.034% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.10% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.10% fail on Rbt
          • 0.10% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.051% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.085% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.068% fail on Pedal
      • 0.017% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.068% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.051% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.034% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.017% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.017% fail on Lever
    • 0.017% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.017% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.017% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.017% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.017% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 0.54% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 0.51% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.30% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.17% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.10% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.034% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.22% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.15% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.034% fail on Emission control equipment (14 times worse than other 2017 cars)
          • 0.017% fail on Catalytic converter
          • 0.017% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.034% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.017% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.034% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.034% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 0.36% fail on Suspension (60% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.068% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.034% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.017% fail on Suspension arm
    • 0.034% fail on Springs (90% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.034% fail on Coil springs (90% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.034% fail on Coil spring (90% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.034% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.017% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.017% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 0.017% fail on Wheel bearings
  • 0.20% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.15% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.12% fail on Condition
      • 0.017% fail on Attachment
      • 0.017% fail on Requirements
    • 0.051% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.15% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.15% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.12% fail on Steering
    • 0.10% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.068% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.017% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.017% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.017% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.017% fail on Steering rack

Search Good Garages