MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Citroen » C-Crosser » 2009

Citroen C-Crosser MOT Results

Registered in 2009
59.5% pass rate
from 662 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen C-Crosser is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Suspension
    • 9.1% fail on Suspension arms (94% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.1% fail on Ball joint (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.15% fail on Suspension arm
    • 6.3% fail on Anti-roll bars (63% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Linkage ball joints (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.76% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.60% fail on Pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.1% fail on Springs (82% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Coil springs (82% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Coil spring (81% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.76% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.76% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.45% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.30% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.15% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.15% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 12% fail on Brakes (38% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.6% fail on Brake linings and pads (77% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 3.5% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.15% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.5% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.5% fail on Brake discs
    • 3.8% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.3% fail on Rbt
          • 2.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.30% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.30% fail on Decelerometer (21 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.30% fail on Service brake performance (21 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.76% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.76% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.76% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.15% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.60% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (71% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.45% fail on Rbt (sp) (77% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.45% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.15% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.15% fail on Rbt
          • 0.15% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 0.91% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.60% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.30% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.76% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.76% fail on Lever
    • 0.30% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.15% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.15% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 12% fail on Steering (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 12% fail on Steering linkage components (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 11% fail on Track rod end (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.15% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.15% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.15% fail on Steering play
      • 0.15% fail on Steering rack
  • 8.8% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (30% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (77% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp levelling device (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Headlamp (80% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.15% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.15% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.15% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 5.7% fail on Visibility
    • 3.3% fail on Wipers
    • 2.4% fail on Washers
    • 0.15% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.15% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.15% fail on Windscreen
  • 5.6% fail on Tyres
    • 3.3% fail on Condition
    • 2.6% fail on Tread depth
  • 3.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.9% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.0% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.91% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.15% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.91% fail on Spark ignition (67% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.91% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.30% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.30% fail on Engine oil leaks
    • 0.15% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.15% fail on Undertray
  • 1.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure (61% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.60% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.60% fail on Tank (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.45% fail on Transmission (76% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Drive shafts (83% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on Joints (83% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.15% fail on Prop shaft
    • 0.15% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.15% fail on Spare wheel condition
      • 0.15% fail on Carrier
    • 0.15% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.15% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.15% fail on Body
      • 0.15% fail on Other body component
    • 0.15% fail on Seats
      • 0.15% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.15% fail on Undertray
  • 0.76% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.76% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.60% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.60% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.45% fail on Condition
      • 0.15% fail on Requirements
  • 0.45% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.45% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages