Citroen AX MOT Results

Registered in 1995
65.9% pass rate
from 91 tests in 2021
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen AX is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Brakes
    • 13% fail on Brake performance
      • 7.7% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 7.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 6.6% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
      • 5.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 5.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 4.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.4% fail on Rbt
          • 2.2% fail on Service brake performance
          • 2.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt
          • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 2.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.2% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (9 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 1.1% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 1.1% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.1% fail on Lever
    • 1.1% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 7.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 7.7% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.1% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.1% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.1% fail on Battery(ies)
  • 12% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.3% fail on Transmission
      • 3.3% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.3% fail on Joints
    • 3.3% fail on Doors (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Other passenger's door (10 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 2.2% fail on Door condition (10 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Driver's door
        • 1.1% fail on Door condition
      • 1.1% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 1.1% fail on Door condition
    • 2.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 2.2% fail on Chassis
      • 2.2% fail on Chassis condition
    • 2.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.1% fail on Load security
      • 1.1% fail on Tailgate
        • 1.1% fail on Tailgate condition
    • 1.1% fail on Boot lid
      • 1.1% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 12% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 11% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 9.9% fail on Spark ignition
        • 7.7% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 2.2% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 1.1% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.1% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.1% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.1% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 7.7% fail on Suspension
    • 5.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.3% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.1% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.1% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.1% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 5.5% fail on Visibility
    • 3.3% fail on Washers
    • 2.2% fail on Wipers
  • 5.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 5.5% fail on Seat belts
      • 4.4% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
  • 4.4% fail on Tyres
    • 3.3% fail on Condition
    • 1.1% fail on Tread depth

Search Good Garages