Chrysler Neon MOT Results

Registered in 2002
51.7% pass rate
from 60 tests in 2021
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler Neon is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Brakes
    • 8.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 6.7% fail on Brake linings and pads (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 6.7% fail on Brake pads (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 5.0% fail on Brake discs and drums (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 5.0% fail on Brake discs (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 8.3% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 3.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.7% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt
          • 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 1.7% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 6.7% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 6.7% fail on Anti-lock braking system (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Parking brake control (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Lever (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  • 18% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 6.7% fail on Headlamp
    • 6.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 5.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 5.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 3.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 3.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 3.3% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.7% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 1.7% fail on Horn
    • 1.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.7% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 1.7% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 15% fail on Suspension
    • 10% fail on Suspension arms
      • 6.7% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 5.0% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.7% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.7% fail on Linkage
      • 1.7% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 1.7% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.7% fail on Springs
      • 1.7% fail on Coil springs
        • 1.7% fail on Coil spring
    • 1.7% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 13% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 8.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 8.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Chassis
      • 3.3% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.7% fail on Bumpers
  • 8.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 8.3% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 6.7% fail on Spark ignition
        • 3.3% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 3.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 1.7% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.7% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
  • 6.7% fail on Steering
    • 6.7% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 6.7% fail on Track rod end
  • 6.7% fail on Visibility
    • 3.3% fail on Wipers
    • 3.3% fail on Washers
  • 5.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 5.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 5.0% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 3.3% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 3.3% fail on Registration plates
  • 3.3% fail on Tyres
    • 1.7% fail on Condition
    • 1.7% fail on Tread depth

Search Good Garages