MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Chrysler » Grand Voyager » 2012

Chrysler Grand Voyager MOT Results

Registered in 2012
57.5% pass rate
from 341 tests in 2021
(38% worse than other 2012 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler Grand Voyager is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Brakes (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 15% fail on Brake performance (4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 11% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (9 times worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 11% fail on Rbt (sp) (9 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 6.2% fail on Parking brake performance (12 times worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 5.9% fail on Rbt (12 times worse than other 2012 cars)
          • 5.0% fail on Parking brake performance (11 times worse than other 2012 cars)
          • 0.88% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (20 times worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.29% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.29% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 4.1% fail on Service brake performance (190% worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 3.8% fail on Rbt (180% worse than other 2012 cars)
          • 3.5% fail on Service brake performance (200% worse than other 2012 cars)
          • 0.88% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.29% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.29% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.88% fail on Service brake performance (4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
          • 0.59% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.29% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 8.5% fail on Mechanical brake components (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 7.0% fail on Brake linings and pads (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 7.0% fail on Brake pads (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 2.3% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.59% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (8 times worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.29% fail on Cable
        • 0.29% fail on Lever
    • 1.2% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (13 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (17 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.29% fail on Electronic stability control
  • 11% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.6% fail on Direction indicators (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 5.6% fail on Flashing type (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 4.1% fail on Side repeaters (5 times worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 1.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.29% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.59% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.59% fail on Battery(ies) (7 times worse than other 2012 cars)
  • 7.3% fail on Suspension
    • 4.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.9% fail on Pins and bushes (130% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.29% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.2% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.88% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.29% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.88% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.29% fail on Axles
      • 0.29% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.29% fail on Springs
      • 0.29% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.29% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.29% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.29% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  • 5.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (180% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Exhaust emissions (190% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Compression ignition (4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 3.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (7 times worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.59% fail on Emissions not tested (7 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.29% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.29% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 5.3% fail on Tyres
    • 3.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.29% fail on Size/type
  • 3.5% fail on Visibility
    • 1.8% fail on Wipers
    • 1.8% fail on Washers
    • 0.29% fail on View to rear
      • 0.29% fail on Mirrors
  • 2.1% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.88% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.29% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.29% fail on Body
      • 0.29% fail on Panel
    • 0.29% fail on Doors
      • 0.29% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.29% fail on Door condition
    • 0.29% fail on Undertray
  • 1.8% fail on Road Wheels (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Attachment (5 times worse than other 2012 cars)
  • 1.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.2% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.29% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.29% fail on Condition
  • 0.88% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.88% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.29% fail on Steering
    • 0.29% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.29% fail on Track rod end
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages