Chrysler 300 MOT Results

Registered in 2010

57.6% pass rate

from 158 tests in 2021

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler 300 is unusually good or bad.

26% fail on Brakes (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 22% fail on Brake performance (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 17% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 17% fail on Rbt (sp) (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 8.2% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 8.2% fail on Rbt (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      - 6.3% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      - 2.5% fail on Service brake imbalance (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 4.4% fail on Parking brake performance (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 4.4% fail on Rbt (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      - 3.8% fail on Parking brake performance (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      - 0.63% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
  - 0.63% fail on Brake performance not tested
  - 0.63% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 0.63% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 0.63% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 1.3% fail on Flexible brake hoses (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 1.3% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 1.3% fail on Brake discs
- 0.63% fail on Parking brake control
  - 0.63% fail on Lever
- 0.63% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
  - 0.63% fail on Electronic stability control
13% fail on Suspension
- 8.9% fail on Suspension arms (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 5.1% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 3.8% fail on Ball joint
  - 1.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 3.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
  - 1.9% fail on Pins and bushes (29 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.63% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.63% fail on Linkage ball joints
  - 0.63% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 1.3% fail on Springs
  - 1.3% fail on Coil springs
    - 1.3% fail on Coil spring
- 1.3% fail on Other suspension component
  - 0.63% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.63% fail on Ball joint dust cover
11% fail on Steering (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 9.5% fail on Steering linkage components (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 8.9% fail on Track rod end (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.63% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.63% fail on Steering arm
- 1.3% fail on Steering gear
  - 1.3% fail on Steering rack
6.3% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 3.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 1.3% fail on Stop lamp
- 1.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 0.63% fail on Headlamps
  - 0.63% fail on Headlamp
- 0.63% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 0.63% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.63% fail on Direction indicators
  - 0.63% fail on Flashing type
    - 0.63% fail on Side repeaters
5.1% fail on Tyres
- 3.2% fail on Tread depth
- 1.9% fail on Condition
3.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 2.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 1.9% fail on Compression ignition
    - 1.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    - 0.63% fail on Emissions not tested
  - 0.63% fail on Spark ignition
    - 0.63% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.63% fail on Fluid leaks
  - 0.63% fail on Engine oil leaks
1.9% fail on Visibility
- 1.9% fail on Washers
1.3% fail on Road Wheels
- 1.3% fail on Attachment
0.63% fail on Body, chassis, structure
- 0.63% fail on Exhaust system
0.63% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.63% fail on Seat belts
  - 0.63% fail on Condition