MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Chevrolet » Lacetti » 2010

Chevrolet Lacetti MOT Results

Registered in 2010
57.5% pass rate
from 318 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Chevrolet Lacetti is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Brakes (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 14% fail on Brake performance (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 7.9% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 7.9% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 7.2% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake imbalance (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 4.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.31% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 3.5% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 2.5% fail on Service brake imbalance (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.5% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.63% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.1% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 3.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 2.2% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 2.2% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.2% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Anti-lock braking system (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Parking brake control (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Lever (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.94% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.94% fail on Hand lever (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.1% fail on Headlamp
    • 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.94% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.63% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.63% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.31% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.31% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.31% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.31% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.31% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 10% fail on Suspension
    • 4.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.8% fail on Linkage ball joints (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Ball joint
    • 4.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.5% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.63% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.94% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.63% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.31% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.31% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.31% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.31% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.31% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.31% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.31% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.31% fail on Ball joint
  • 9.1% fail on Visibility (71% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on Wipers (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Washers
    • 0.31% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.31% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.31% fail on Windscreen
  • 5.0% fail on Tyres
    • 4.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.6% fail on Condition
  • 4.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Airbags
      • 0.31% fail on Passengers airbag
  • 3.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.8% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.8% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.94% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.63% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.94% fail on Fluid leaks (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.94% fail on Engine oil leaks (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 3.1% fail on Steering
    • 2.8% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.8% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.31% fail on Power steering
      • 0.31% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 2.5% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 1.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.3% fail on Transmission
      • 1.3% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.3% fail on Joints
    • 0.31% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.31% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
  • 0.31% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.31% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages