Chevrolet Lacetti MOT Results

Registered in 2009
49.3% pass rate
from 977 tests in 2021
(28% worse than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Chevrolet Lacetti is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Brakes (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 14% fail on Brake performance (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 6.7% fail on Service brake performance (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 6.7% fail on Rbt (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 6.4% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.92% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 5.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 5.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 3.9% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 3.9% fail on Rbt (sp) (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 3.5% fail on Service brake imbalance (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.92% fail on Service brake performance (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 3.4% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 3.0% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.41% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 8.3% fail on Mechanical brake components (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Brake linings and pads (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 6.3% fail on Brake pads (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Brake discs and drums (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.5% fail on Brake discs (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.20% fail on Lever (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Anti-lock braking system (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Parking brake control (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Lever (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.92% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.72% fail on Hand lever (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Pedal
    • 0.51% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.20% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.20% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.20% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.10% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.10% fail on Leaks
  • 21% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (68% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 8.4% fail on Stop lamp (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.9% fail on Headlamps (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 6.9% fail on Headlamp (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Headlamp aim (95% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.4% fail on Headlamp aim (92% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.72% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.82% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.72% fail on Battery(ies) (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Horn
    • 0.41% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.41% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.41% fail on Direction indicators (79% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Flashing type (79% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on Individual direction indicators (83% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.10% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.20% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.20% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.20% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.10% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.10% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.10% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 14% fail on Suspension
    • 7.8% fail on Anti-roll bars (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Linkage ball joints (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.41% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.31% fail on Linkage
      • 0.31% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.10% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 4.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.0% fail on Ball joint (82% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Pins and bushes (79% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.2% fail on Macpherson strut (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Pins and bushes (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.72% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.61% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.41% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.41% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.31% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.10% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.31% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.31% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.20% fail on Springs (96% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Coil springs (96% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Coil spring
        • 0.10% fail on Mounting
    • 0.10% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.10% fail on Ball joint
  • 9.2% fail on Visibility (56% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Wipers (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Washers
    • 0.41% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.10% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.10% fail on Windscreen
  • 6.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (49% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.6% fail on Spark ignition (68% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.61% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.41% fail on Compression ignition (72% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.31% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 1.9% fail on Fluid leaks (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Engine oil leaks (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 6.3% fail on Tyres
    • 4.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.31% fail on Size/type
  • 5.4% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.1% fail on Exhaust system (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.61% fail on Transmission (68% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Drive shafts (72% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.51% fail on Joints (72% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.10% fail on Joints
    • 0.31% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.31% fail on Tank (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Seats
      • 0.31% fail on Driver's seat (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Body
      • 0.10% fail on Panel
      • 0.10% fail on Other body component
    • 0.20% fail on Doors
      • 0.20% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.20% fail on Door condition
    • 0.10% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.10% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
  • 4.2% fail on Steering (77% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.5% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.92% fail on Steering gear (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.92% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.92% fail on Power steering (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.72% fail on Other components (23 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Operation
      • 0.10% fail on Rams
  • 3.8% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.31% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.72% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.72% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.41% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.31% fail on Attachment
    • 0.10% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages