MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Audi » TT » 2000

Audi TT MOT Results

Registered in 2000
55.0% pass rate
from 2,684 tests in 2021
(6.2% worse than other 2000 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Audi TT is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Suspension (15% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 7.1% fail on Suspension arms (59% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.7% fail on Pins and bushes (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.48% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.22% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 6.6% fail on Springs (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 6.6% fail on Coil springs (150% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 6.6% fail on Coil spring (150% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.037% fail on Torsion bars
        • 0.037% fail on Torsion bar
    • 5.7% fail on Anti-roll bars (52% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Linkage ball joints (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (160% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Ball joint (180% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.45% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.22% fail on Linkage
      • 0.15% fail on Anti-roll bar
    • 0.71% fail on Macpherson strut (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.037% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.63% fail on Wheel bearings (49% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.48% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.37% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.075% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (80% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.037% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.48% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.26% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.19% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.037% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.45% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.37% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (92% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.037% fail on Suspension rod
      • 0.037% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.037% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 15% fail on Brakes (14% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 6.3% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.7% fail on Anti-lock braking system (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Electronic stability control (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.075% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 5.0% fail on Brake performance (33% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.1% fail on Rbt
          • 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.19% fail on Service brake imbalance (71% better than other 2000 cars)
          • 0.037% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.22% fail on Decelerometer (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 0.22% fail on Service brake performance (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.075% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.075% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (50% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.89% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.75% fail on Rbt (sp) (77% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.037% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
        • 0.037% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
      • 1.0% fail on Brake performance not tested (150% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (76% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.34% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Rbt (sp) (90% better than other 2000 cars)
          • 0.19% fail on Service brake performance (80% better than other 2000 cars)
          • 0.075% fail on Service brake imbalance (95% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Parking brake performance (77% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on Rbt (76% better than other 2000 cars)
          • 0.22% fail on Parking brake performance (79% better than other 2000 cars)
          • 0.037% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.037% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
    • 4.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes (36% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.2% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.86% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.86% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.26% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.15% fail on Lever
        • 0.075% fail on Cable
        • 0.037% fail on Linkage
    • 0.75% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.63% fail on Pedal (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.45% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.37% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.075% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.22% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.22% fail on Lever
    • 0.22% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.19% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.11% fail on Master cylinder (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.075% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.075% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.037% fail on Leaks
      • 0.037% fail on Servos
    • 0.037% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.037% fail on Other components
  • 15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.4% fail on Headlamps (35% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Headlamp
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp levelling device (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.4% fail on Headlamp aim (32% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.7% fail on Stop lamp (31% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Hazard warning (8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Switch (8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.3% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.82% fail on Battery(ies) (75% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Horn
      • 0.11% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 1.2% fail on Direction indicators (48% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Flashing type (48% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.67% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.41% fail on Individual direction indicators (72% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.41% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (70% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Rear fog lamp (70% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.41% fail on Rear fog lamp (70% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.30% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.037% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.037% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 12% fail on Body, chassis, structure (19% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 8.3% fail on Transmission (180% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 8.0% fail on Drive shafts (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 8.0% fail on Joints (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.037% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.34% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.34% fail on Joints
    • 2.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.37% fail on Doors
      • 0.30% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.30% fail on Door condition
      • 0.075% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.075% fail on Door condition
    • 0.37% fail on Seats
      • 0.34% fail on Passenger's seat (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.037% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.26% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.19% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.075% fail on Pipe
    • 0.19% fail on Undertray (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Integral vehicle structure (90% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (92% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.037% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.037% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 0.075% fail on Body
      • 0.037% fail on Panel
      • 0.037% fail on Other body component
    • 0.037% fail on Chassis
      • 0.037% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.037% fail on Cabs
      • 0.037% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.037% fail on Passenger compartment
  • 7.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 7.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 7.4% fail on Spark ignition
        • 5.3% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.4% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.97% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.48% fail on Emission control equipment (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 0.41% fail on Catalytic converter (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 0.11% fail on Oxygen sensor (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.34% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.15% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.075% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.075% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.075% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.037% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.41% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.34% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.037% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
      • 0.037% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.15% fail on Noise suppression (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Undertray (8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  • 6.9% fail on Visibility
    • 3.6% fail on Wipers
    • 3.6% fail on Washers
    • 0.15% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.15% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.15% fail on View to rear
      • 0.15% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.037% fail on Bonnet
  • 6.3% fail on Tyres (33% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Tread depth (53% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Condition
    • 0.11% fail on Size/type
  • 6.0% fail on Steering (57% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Steering linkage components (63% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Track rod end (89% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.037% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.037% fail on Locking devices
    • 1.5% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.5% fail on Steering rack (57% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.86% fail on Power steering (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Pipes and hoses (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Other components
      • 0.15% fail on Operation
      • 0.037% fail on Rams
    • 0.037% fail on Steering play
      • 0.037% fail on Steering rack
  • 2.8% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (29% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (48% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.60% fail on Seat belts (76% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Prescribed areas (84% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Condition (68% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.075% fail on Requirements
      • 0.037% fail on Attachment
    • 0.15% fail on Airbags
      • 0.15% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.71% fail on Road Wheels (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.52% fail on Attachment (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Condition
  • 0.63% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.63% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.11% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.11% fail on Speedometer (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)

Search Good Garages