MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Audi » Q5 » 2017

Audi Q5 MOT Results

Registered in 2017
85.3% pass rate
from 10,537 tests in 2021
(17% worse than other 2017 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the Audi Q5 is unusually good or bad.

  • 7.2% fail on Suspension (7 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 7.0% fail on Springs (19 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 7.0% fail on Coil springs (19 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 7.0% fail on Coil spring (19 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.34% fail on Mounting (52 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Suspension arms (55% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.095% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.0095% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.047% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.019% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.0095% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.0095% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.0095% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.0095% fail on Other components
  • 3.6% fail on Tyres
    • 1.9% fail on Condition
    • 1.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.028% fail on Size/type
  • 1.5% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (42% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.83% fail on Headlamp aim (37% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Headlamp aim (35% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.0095% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.25% fail on Headlamps (51% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.057% fail on Headlamp (87% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.0095% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.15% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.15% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.15% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.13% fail on Stop lamp (60% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.085% fail on Direction indicators (65% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.085% fail on Flashing type (65% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.047% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.028% fail on Side repeaters (84% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.0095% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.066% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.066% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.066% fail on Rear reflectors (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.038% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.019% fail on Horn
      • 0.0095% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.0095% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.028% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (86% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.019% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.0095% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.0095% fail on Switch
    • 0.019% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.019% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (5 times worse than other 2017 cars)
  • 1.2% fail on Brakes (41% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.92% fail on Mechanical brake components (38% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.83% fail on Brake linings and pads (34% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.82% fail on Brake pads (34% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.019% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.11% fail on Brake discs and drums (67% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Brake discs (67% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Brake performance (55% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Service brake performance (50% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Rbt (52% better than other 2017 cars)
          • 0.13% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.0095% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.0095% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.0095% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.057% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.019% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (85% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.019% fail on Rbt (sp) (84% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.057% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.038% fail on Electronic braking system (4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.019% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.0095% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.028% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.019% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.0095% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.0095% fail on Electronic parking brake
    • 0.0095% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.0095% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 1.0% fail on Visibility (72% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.50% fail on Washers (48% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.42% fail on Wipers (85% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.10% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.019% fail on View to rear
      • 0.019% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.0095% fail on Driver's view
  • 0.47% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 0.46% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.30% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.29% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (81% worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.0095% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.0095% fail on Particulate filter
      • 0.15% fail on Spark ignition (51% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.0095% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.0095% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.0095% fail on Undertray
  • 0.38% fail on Identification of the vehicle (85% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on Registration plates (85% worse than other 2017 cars)
  • 0.30% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.17% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.16% fail on Condition
      • 0.0095% fail on Requirements
    • 0.13% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.13% fail on Body, chassis, structure (57% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.066% fail on Transmission
      • 0.066% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.066% fail on Joints
    • 0.028% fail on Body
      • 0.028% fail on Other body component
    • 0.019% fail on Doors
      • 0.0095% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.0095% fail on Door condition
      • 0.0095% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.0095% fail on Door condition
    • 0.0095% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.0095% fail on Undertray
  • 0.047% fail on Road Wheels (70% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.038% fail on Attachment
    • 0.0095% fail on Condition
  • 0.028% fail on Steering (81% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.019% fail on Electronic power steering (5 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.0095% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.0095% fail on Steering box
Read the Honest John Review

  • Audi Q5 (2017 on)
    Even more refined and upmarket than original Q5. Lovely quality interior. Electric tailgate fitted as standard. 2.0 litre petrol plug-in hybrid from May 2019.
  • Audi Q5 (2008 - 2017)
    Refined and practical. Impressive rear passenger space and decent boot. Good economy from 2.0 TDI. Long-distance comfort.

    Search Good Garages