MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Alfa Romeo » Mito » 2009

Alfa Romeo Mito MOT Results

Registered in 2009
58.1% pass rate
from 4,779 tests in 2021
(12% worse than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Alfa Romeo Mito is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Suspension (16% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 10% fail on Springs (76% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 10% fail on Coil springs (77% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 10% fail on Coil spring (77% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.063% fail on Mounting
    • 4.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.5% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.5% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.54% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.40% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.063% fail on Linkage (73% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.021% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 2.6% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Sub-frames (200% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.94% fail on Sub-frame (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.75% fail on Suspension arms (84% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Pins and bushes (87% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint (90% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.084% fail on Ball joint dust cover (86% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.042% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.27% fail on Shock absorbers (69% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.13% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.084% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.021% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.021% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.19% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.063% fail on Other suspension component (78% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.042% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.021% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.021% fail on Axles
      • 0.021% fail on Axle
  • 16% fail on Brakes (82% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 11% fail on Brake performance (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 8.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 8.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Service brake performance (30% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 3.1% fail on Rbt (28% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.71% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.084% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.063% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
          • 0.021% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.021% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.021% fail on Service brake performance
      • 3.1% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 3.1% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 2.6% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.33% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.084% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.021% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.021% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.021% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.021% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.94% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (56% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.94% fail on Rbt (sp) (59% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.92% fail on Service brake imbalance (79% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.063% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.31% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.2% fail on Mechanical brake components (75% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Brake linings and pads (81% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 3.7% fail on Brake pads (81% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.021% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.9% fail on Brake discs and drums (68% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Brake discs (70% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.36% fail on Cable (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Lever (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.71% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Pedal (200% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.65% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.40% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.38% fail on Electronic stability control (98% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.44% fail on Lever
    • 0.42% fail on Flexible brake hoses (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Rigid brake pipes (70% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.19% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.15% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.13% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.021% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.021% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.021% fail on Leaks
  • 10% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (18% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Headlamps (38% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Headlamp (44% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.29% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (35% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.59% fail on Reversing lamps (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Reversing lamps (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 0.54% fail on Stop lamp (84% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.50% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.27% fail on Horn
      • 0.13% fail on Electrical wiring (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.42% fail on Direction indicators (79% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Flashing type (79% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.31% fail on Side repeaters (56% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Individual direction indicators (89% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.042% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.021% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.021% fail on All position lamps
  • 6.4% fail on Tyres
    • 3.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.29% fail on Size/type
  • 6.1% fail on Body, chassis, structure (30% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Exhaust system (76% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.98% fail on Transmission (49% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.94% fail on Drive shafts (48% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.94% fail on Joints (48% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.042% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.042% fail on Joints
    • 0.61% fail on Fuel system (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Tank
      • 0.021% fail on Pipe
    • 0.50% fail on Engine mounting (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Engine mounting condition (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.084% fail on Bracket (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.42% fail on Doors
      • 0.31% fail on Driver's door (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.31% fail on Door condition (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.084% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.084% fail on Door condition
      • 0.021% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.021% fail on Door condition
    • 0.27% fail on Seats (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Driver's seat (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.13% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.084% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.042% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.042% fail on Sub-frame condition
      • 0.042% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.084% fail on Body
      • 0.084% fail on Other body component
    • 0.063% fail on Undertray
    • 0.021% fail on Load security
      • 0.021% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.021% fail on Tailgate condition
    • 0.021% fail on Cabs
      • 0.021% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 5.8% fail on Visibility
    • 3.0% fail on Washers
    • 2.7% fail on Wipers
    • 0.15% fail on View to rear
      • 0.15% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.021% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.13% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.13% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.042% fail on Bonnet
  • 5.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (19% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Exhaust emissions (23% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Spark ignition (65% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.5% fail on Catalyst emissions (87% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.021% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.67% fail on Compression ignition (55% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.29% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.15% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.13% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (83% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.084% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.042% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.021% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
    • 0.10% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.042% fail on Engine oil leaks (82% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.042% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.021% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
    • 0.042% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.021% fail on Sound deadening material
      • 0.021% fail on Undertray
  • 1.8% fail on Steering
    • 1.3% fail on Steering linkage components (32% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.23% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.15% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.084% fail on Operation (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Power steering
      • 0.17% fail on Operation (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Pump
    • 0.084% fail on Electronic power steering
    • 0.021% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.021% fail on Steering play
      • 0.021% fail on Steering rack
  • 1.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (45% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.80% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.71% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.56% fail on Condition
      • 0.084% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.063% fail on Requirements
    • 0.042% fail on Airbags
      • 0.042% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.46% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.46% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.40% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.38% fail on Attachment
    • 0.021% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages