Alfa Romeo GT MOT Results

Registered in 2009
55.0% pass rate
from 189 tests in 2021
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Alfa Romeo GT is unusually good or bad.

  • 14% fail on Brakes (63% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 8.5% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.8% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 5.8% fail on Rbt (sp) (200% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 4.2% fail on Rbt (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 3.7% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.53% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.53% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.53% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.53% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.53% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.53% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.53% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 4.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.6% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 2.6% fail on Brake discs
      • 1.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.6% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Cable (16 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 1.1% fail on Hand lever
    • 1.1% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.1% fail on Lever
    • 1.1% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.53% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.53% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.53% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.53% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.53% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 5.8% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.2% fail on Headlamp
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp levelling device (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Electrical equipment (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Horn (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 1.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.1% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.53% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.53% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.53% fail on Individual direction indicators
  • 14% fail on Suspension
    • 8.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 7.4% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Ball joint
    • 2.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.53% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.53% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 0.53% fail on Springs
      • 0.53% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.53% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.53% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.53% fail on Ball joint
  • 12% fail on Visibility (97% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 11% fail on Washers (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Wipers
  • 9.0% fail on Body, chassis, structure (91% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.6% fail on Transmission
      • 2.6% fail on Drive shafts
        • 2.6% fail on Joints
    • 2.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure (19 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (23 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Doors
      • 1.1% fail on Front passenger's door (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Door condition (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.53% fail on Seats
      • 0.53% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.53% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.53% fail on Undertray
  • 9.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 8.5% fail on Exhaust emissions (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.3% fail on Compression ignition (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 3.2% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 1.1% fail on Emission control equipment (52 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 1.1% fail on Catalytic converter (238 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.53% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 3.2% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.1% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 1.1% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.1% fail on Engine oil leaks
    • 0.53% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.53% fail on Undertray
  • 6.9% fail on Tyres
    • 4.8% fail on Condition
    • 2.6% fail on Tread depth
  • 2.1% fail on Steering
    • 1.6% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.6% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.53% fail on Steering play
      • 0.53% fail on Steering rack
  • 1.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.1% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.1% fail on Prescribed areas (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.53% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.53% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.53% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.53% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages