Alfa Romeo GT MOT Results

Registered in 2005
50.1% pass rate
from 409 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Alfa Romeo GT is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Suspension
    • 8.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 8.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 5.1% fail on Pins and bushes (93% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.49% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.49% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.24% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.9% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.73% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.49% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.49% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.24% fail on Linkage
      • 0.24% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.24% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.24% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 2.4% fail on Sub-frames (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Sub-frame (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.73% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 2.0% fail on Springs (58% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Coil springs (58% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Coil spring (68% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.49% fail on Mounting (12 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.73% fail on Suspension rods (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Suspension rod
      • 0.24% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.24% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.49% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.49% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.24% fail on Axles
      • 0.24% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.24% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.24% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.24% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.4% fail on Headlamp aim (78% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 6.4% fail on Headlamp aim (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.0% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.7% fail on Side repeaters
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp (56% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on Headlamp levelling device (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Electrical equipment (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Horn (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.73% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 2.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.73% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.73% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.24% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.24% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 16% fail on Body, chassis, structure (86% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Exhaust system (96% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Transmission
      • 3.7% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.7% fail on Joints
    • 2.4% fail on Chassis (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Chassis condition (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.73% fail on Doors
      • 0.49% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.49% fail on Door condition
      • 0.24% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.24% fail on Door condition
    • 0.49% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.49% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.24% fail on Floor
    • 0.24% fail on Seats
      • 0.24% fail on Driver's seat
  • 14% fail on Visibility (82% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 10% fail on Washers (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Wipers
    • 0.24% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.24% fail on Windscreen
  • 12% fail on Brakes
    • 8.6% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 5.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 3.2% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 3.2% fail on Rbt (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 2.9% fail on Parking brake performance (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.24% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 2.2% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.2% fail on Rbt
          • 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.49% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.49% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.49% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.49% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.24% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.2% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.0% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.24% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.7% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.7% fail on Brake discs
      • 1.2% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.98% fail on Cable (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.24% fail on Linkage
    • 0.73% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.73% fail on Lever
    • 0.49% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.49% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.49% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.49% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.24% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.24% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.24% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.24% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.24% fail on Servos
    • 0.24% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.24% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 12% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.6% fail on Seat belts (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 5.6% fail on Prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on Condition
    • 6.4% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Airbags
      • 0.24% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 8.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 8.8% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 5.4% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.7% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 1.7% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.49% fail on Emission control equipment (11 times worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.24% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve
          • 0.24% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.24% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 3.7% fail on Compression ignition (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 2.2% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.98% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.73% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.24% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.24% fail on Catalytic converter
    • 0.24% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.24% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 6.4% fail on Tyres
    • 4.4% fail on Condition
    • 2.2% fail on Tread depth
  • 2.7% fail on Steering
    • 0.98% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.73% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.24% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.73% fail on Power steering
      • 0.49% fail on Pipes and hoses (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Other components
    • 0.49% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.49% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.49% fail on Steering play
      • 0.49% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.24% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.24% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.24% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.24% fail on Anchorages
  • 0.24% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.24% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages