Rover 400, registered in 1990
49.6% pass rate
from 264 tests between October 2010 and September 2011
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Rover 400 is unusually good or bad.
-
28% fail on
Suspension
(42% worse than other 1990 cars)
-
13% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 1990 cars)
-
13% fail on
Front drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 1990 cars)
- 13% fail on Constant velocity joints (2 times worse than other 1990 cars)
-
13% fail on
Front drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 1990 cars)
-
13% fail on
Prescribed areas
(59% worse than other 1990 cars)
- 11% fail on Component mounting (73% worse than other 1990 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Subframe mounting
- 0.76% fail on Spring mounting
-
2.7% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.7% fail on Pins / bushes
-
2.7% fail on
Trailing arms
(9 times worse than other 1990 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Pins / bushes (11 times worse than other 1990 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.1% fail on Linkage
-
1.1% fail on
Sub-frames
- 1.1% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 1990 cars)
- 0.76% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.76% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.76% fail on Condition
-
0.38% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.38% fail on Pins / bushes
-
13% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 1990 cars)
-
23% fail on
Lighting and signalling
- 7.6% fail on Stop lamp (92% worse than other 1990 cars)
- 6.1% fail on Headlamp aim
- 5.7% fail on Registration plate
-
4.5% fail on
Position lamps
- 4.5% fail on Front lamps
-
1.9% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.9% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.5% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.76% fail on Side repeaters
-
1.9% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.9% fail on Horn
-
1.5% fail on
Fog lamp
- 1.5% fail on Fog lamp
-
1.5% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.5% fail on Headlamp
- 0.38% fail on Switch
-
11% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 5.3% fail on Wipers
- 3.4% fail on Washers
- 1.9% fail on Mirrors (2 times worse than other 1990 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Windscreen
- 0.38% fail on Bonnet
-
9.1% fail on
Fuel and exhaust
- 6.8% fail on Exhaust system
-
2.7% fail on
Spark ignition
- 2.7% fail on Non catalyst
-
0.38% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.38% fail on Cap
-
8.3% fail on
Seat belts
- 6.8% fail on Prescribed areas
- 1.5% fail on Condition
- 0.38% fail on Requirements
- 0.38% fail on Attachment
-
8.0% fail on
Brakes
(56% better than other 1990 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Brake performance
(51% better than other 1990 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Front wheels
- 2.3% fail on Parking brake performance
- 1.5% fail on Rear wheels (72% better than other 1990 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.5% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.5% fail on Condition
-
1.5% fail on
Hub components
- 1.5% fail on Brake pads
- 0.38% fail on Brake discs
-
5.3% fail on
Brake performance
(51% better than other 1990 cars)
-
7.6% fail on
Tyres
- 5.7% fail on Tread depth
- 2.3% fail on Condition
-
4.2% fail on
Body and structure
- 2.7% fail on Body condition
-
1.5% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 1.5% fail on Chassis
- 0.38% fail on Body security
-
0.38% fail on
Seats
- 0.38% fail on Drivers
-
3.0% fail on
Steering
-
3.0% fail on
Steering system
- 2.3% fail on Steering rack
- 0.38% fail on Track rod end
- 0.38% fail on Steering arm
-
3.0% fail on
Steering system
-
3.0% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 3.0% fail on Registration plate
-
0.38% fail on
Towbars
- 0.38% fail on Towbar
