1996 Renault 19 MOT Results

Renault 19, registered in 1996

35.8% pass rate

from 109 tests between October 2010 and September 2011

More MoT Results

The MoT Files: MoT Data FAQs

All Renault MoT results

Renault 19 MoT results

Test results by year of registration

How cars perform in their first MoT

The Top 50 models

The full story behind the data

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault 19 is unusually good or bad.

38% fail on Lighting and signalling
- 16% fail on Stop lamp (150% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 10% fail on Headlamp aim
- 9.2% fail on Headlamps
  - 8.3% fail on Headlamp
  - 1.8% fail on Switch (12 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 7.3% fail on Position lamps
  - 7.3% fail on Front lamps
- 3.7% fail on Registration plate
- 3.7% fail on Fog lamp
  - 3.7% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.92% fail on Direction indicators
  - 0.92% fail on Flashing type
    - 0.92% fail on Side repeaters
28% fail on Brakes
- 16% fail on Brake performance
  - 5.5% fail on Rear wheels
  - 5.5% fail on Service brake performance
  - 5.5% fail on Parking brake performance
  - 3.7% fail on Front wheels
  - 0.92% fail on Brake operation
- 9.2% fail on Hydraulic systems
  - 9.2% fail on Components
    - 6.4% fail on Hoses
    - 1.8% fail on Pipes
    - 1.8% fail on Valves
- 7.3% fail on Hub components (150% worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 4.6% fail on Brake pads
  - 3.7% fail on Brake discs (3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 4.6% fail on Parking brake
  - 4.6% fail on Condition
28% fail on Suspension
- 20% fail on Prescribed areas (190% worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 13% fail on Component mounting (130% worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 7.3% fail on Subframe mounting (5 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 5.5% fail on Wheel bearings
  - 3.7% fail on Rear
  - 1.8% fail on Front
- 3.7% fail on Coil springs
  - 3.7% fail on Condition
- 1.8% fail on Drive shafts
  - 1.8% fail on Front drive shafts
    - 1.8% fail on Constant velocity joints
- 0.92% fail on Suspension arms
  - 0.92% fail on Pins / bushes
- 0.92% fail on Macpherson strut
  - 0.92% fail on Condition
- 0.92% fail on Shock absorbers
  - 0.92% fail on Condition
22% fail on Fuel and exhaust
- 15% fail on Exhaust system (94% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 12% fail on Spark ignition
  - 12% fail on Catalyst
- 1.8% fail on Fuel system
  - 1.8% fail on System
22% fail on Driver's view of the road (75% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 15% fail on Wipers (120% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 4.6% fail on Washers
- 2.8% fail on Windscreen
- 1.8% fail on Bonnet (13 times worse than other 1996 cars)
14% fail on Steering (150% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 12% fail on Steering system (160% worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 7.3% fail on Steering rack (5 times worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 5.5% fail on Track rod end
- 0.92% fail on Steering operation
- 0.92% fail on Power steering
  - 0.92% fail on Other components
9.2% fail on Tyres
- 7.3% fail on Tread depth
- 1.8% fail on Condition
6.4% fail on Body and structure
- 2.8% fail on Vehicle structure
  - 2.8% fail on Chassis
- 1.8% fail on Doors
  - 1.8% fail on Passengers front
- 0.92% fail on Body condition
- 0.92% fail on Spare wheel
3.7% fail on Seat belts
- 3.7% fail on Prescribed areas
0.92% fail on Road wheels
- 0.92% fail on Attachment
0.92% fail on Registration plates and VIN
- 0.92% fail on Registration plate

Read the Honest John Review

Renault 19 1988
Diesels are frugal. The 16-valve petrol models are free-revving. Available for banger money.

Honest John's Newsletter

Recently Recommended

Most Recommended Garages

Connect with Honest John