1998 Peugeot 806 MOT Results

Peugeot 806, registered in 1998

46.1% pass rate

from 720 tests between October 2010 and September 2011

Pass rate by mileage

More MoT Results

The MoT Files: MoT Data FAQs

All Peugeot MoT results

Peugeot 806 MoT results

Test results by year of registration

How cars perform in their first MoT

The Top 50 models

The full story behind the data

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1998 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 806 is unusually good or bad.

30% fail on Lighting and signalling
- 9.3% fail on Registration plate
- 8.6% fail on Position lamps
  - 8.2% fail on Front lamps
  - 0.28% fail on All position lamps
  - 0.28% fail on Rear lamps
- 8.2% fail on Headlamp aim
- 6.9% fail on Stop lamp
- 5.1% fail on Direction indicators
  - 5.1% fail on Flashing type
    - 2.1% fail on Direction indicators
    - 1.8% fail on Individual lamps
    - 1.3% fail on Side repeaters
    - 0.28% fail on Switch
- 3.5% fail on Headlamps
  - 3.3% fail on Headlamp
  - 0.14% fail on Matched pair
- 2.2% fail on Horn (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.97% fail on Fog lamp
  - 0.97% fail on Fog lamp
  - 0.28% fail on Tell tale
- 0.14% fail on Rear reflectors
18% fail on Brakes
- 9.6% fail on Hydraulic systems
  - 9.3% fail on Components
    - 5.8% fail on Hoses (130% worse than other 1998 cars)
    - 2.8% fail on Valves (170% worse than other 1998 cars)
    - 1.8% fail on Pipes (68% better than other 1998 cars)
    - 0.14% fail on Reservoirs
  - 0.28% fail on Leaks
  - 0.14% fail on Operation
- 7.6% fail on Brake performance (34% better than other 1998 cars)
  - 3.3% fail on Rear wheels (42% better than other 1998 cars)
  - 2.9% fail on Front wheels
  - 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance (68% better than other 1998 cars)
  - 0.42% fail on Service brake performance (78% better than other 1998 cars)
  - 0.14% fail on Brake operation
- 1.4% fail on Parking brake
  - 1.4% fail on Condition
- 1.4% fail on Hub components (55% better than other 1998 cars)
  - 0.69% fail on Brake discs
  - 0.56% fail on Brake pads (75% better than other 1998 cars)
  - 0.14% fail on Brake calipers
- 0.56% fail on Service brake control components
  - 0.56% fail on Pedal
    - 0.42% fail on Condition
    - 0.14% fail on Anti-slip
- 0.28% fail on Mechanical components
  - 0.28% fail on Cable
- 0.14% fail on Additional braking devices
- 0.14% fail on Air and vacuum systems
  - 0.14% fail on Components
    - 0.14% fail on Hoses
- 0.14% fail on ABS
17% fail on Driver's view of the road (43% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 9.3% fail on Wipers (41% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 5.8% fail on Washers
- 2.9% fail on Mirrors (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Windscreen
16% fail on Suspension (33% better than other 1998 cars)
- 7.5% fail on Drive shafts
  - 7.5% fail on Front drive shafts
    - 7.5% fail on Constant velocity joints
- 4.6% fail on Suspension arms
  - 4.6% fail on Pins / bushes
- 2.1% fail on Front suspension joints
- 1.1% fail on Wheel bearings
  - 0.97% fail on Front
  - 0.14% fail on Rear
- 0.69% fail on Shock absorbers
  - 0.69% fail on Condition
- 0.56% fail on Coil springs (86% better than other 1998 cars)
  - 0.56% fail on Condition (85% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Anti-roll bars (84% better than other 1998 cars)
  - 0.42% fail on Linkage (84% better than other 1998 cars)
  - 0.14% fail on Attachment
- 0.56% fail on Prescribed areas (89% better than other 1998 cars)
  - 0.42% fail on Component mounting (90% better than other 1998 cars)
  - 0.14% fail on Subframe mounting
- 0.28% fail on Sub-frames
  - 0.14% fail on Condition
  - 0.14% fail on Pins / bushes
16% fail on Fuel and exhaust
- 11% fail on Exhaust system (60% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Compression ignition (5 times worse than other 1998 cars)
  - 3.2% fail on Turbo (5 times worse than other 1998 cars)
  - 0.69% fail on Non turbo (4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Spark ignition (66% better than other 1998 cars)
  - 2.4% fail on Catalyst (66% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.97% fail on Fuel system
  - 0.56% fail on Cap
  - 0.28% fail on System
  - 0.14% fail on Hose
13% fail on Tyres
- 8.3% fail on Tread depth
- 4.6% fail on Condition
- 0.69% fail on Size / type
- 0.28% fail on Valve stem
10% fail on Steering (89% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 9.2% fail on Steering system (100% worse than other 1998 cars)
  - 6.9% fail on Track rod end (130% worse than other 1998 cars)
  - 1.4% fail on Steering rack
  - 0.69% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.42% fail on Free play
    - 0.42% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
  - 0.14% fail on Drag link end
- 1.3% fail on Power steering
  - 0.83% fail on Pipes and hoses (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
  - 0.14% fail on Operation
  - 0.14% fail on Drive system
  - 0.14% fail on Other components
- 0.14% fail on Steering control
  - 0.14% fail on Steering coupling
    - 0.14% fail on Universal joint
2.5% fail on Seat belts (50% better than other 1998 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Requirements (6 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.83% fail on Condition
- 0.28% fail on Attachment
- 0.28% fail on Prescribed areas (93% better than other 1998 cars)
2.2% fail on Body and structure
- 1.3% fail on Body condition
- 0.56% fail on Doors
  - 0.28% fail on Passengers other
  - 0.14% fail on Drivers
  - 0.14% fail on Passengers front
- 0.14% fail on Vehicle structure
  - 0.14% fail on Chassis
- 0.14% fail on Body security
- 0.14% fail on Spare wheel
1.8% fail on Registration plates and VIN
- 1.8% fail on Registration plate
1.1% fail on Road wheels
- 1.1% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Condition

Read the Honest John Review

Peugeot 806 1995
Economical 110bhp HDi. Handy sliding rear doors and a well-designed, airy cabin.

Honest John's Newsletter

Recently Recommended

Most Recommended Garages

Connect with Honest John