Mitsubishi Lancer Evo, registered in 1996
68.8% pass rate
from 288 tests between October 2010 and September 2011
(44% better than other 1996 cars)
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Lancer Evo is unusually good or bad.
-
17% fail on
Lighting and signalling
(38% better than other 1996 cars)
-
10% fail on
Fog lamp
(3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 10% fail on Fog lamp (3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Tell tale
- 0.35% fail on Switch
- 6.3% fail on Headlamp aim
-
3.8% fail on
Position lamps
- 3.1% fail on Front lamps
- 0.69% fail on All position lamps
- 2.1% fail on Registration plate (73% better than other 1996 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.1% fail on Headlamp
- 0.35% fail on Switch
- 1.4% fail on Stop lamp (78% better than other 1996 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Horn
-
0.35% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.35% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.35% fail on Individual lamps
-
0.35% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.35% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.35% fail on Lamp
-
10% fail on
Fog lamp
(3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
15% fail on
Fuel and exhaust
-
11% fail on
Spark ignition
(61% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 11% fail on Catalyst (62% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 5.9% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.69% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.69% fail on Cap
-
11% fail on
Spark ignition
(61% worse than other 1996 cars)
-
8.0% fail on
Steering
-
7.6% fail on
Steering system
- 6.3% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Track rod end
-
0.69% fail on
Free play
- 0.69% fail on Steering rack
-
0.35% fail on
Power steering
- 0.35% fail on Other components
- 0.35% fail on Locking devices
-
7.6% fail on
Steering system
-
6.6% fail on
Brakes
(71% better than other 1996 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(79% better than other 1996 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Components
(78% better than other 1996 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Pipes (71% better than other 1996 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Hoses
-
2.1% fail on
Components
(78% better than other 1996 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Brake performance
(83% better than other 1996 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Front wheels
- 0.69% fail on Rear wheels (89% better than other 1996 cars)
- 0.69% fail on Brake operation (9 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Hub components
- 1.0% fail on Brake discs
- 0.69% fail on Brake pads
- 0.69% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.35% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.35% fail on Condition
-
0.35% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.35% fail on
Pedal
- 0.35% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.35% fail on
Pedal
- 0.35% fail on ABS
-
2.1% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(79% better than other 1996 cars)
-
5.9% fail on
Tyres
(49% better than other 1996 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Tread depth (53% better than other 1996 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Condition
- 0.35% fail on Size / type
-
5.2% fail on
Suspension
(79% better than other 1996 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.0% fail on Pins / bushes
- 0.35% fail on Attachment
- 0.35% fail on Linkage
-
1.4% fail on
Prescribed areas
(80% better than other 1996 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Component mounting (75% better than other 1996 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Suspension arms
(80% better than other 1996 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Pins / bushes (79% better than other 1996 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.69% fail on Front
- 0.35% fail on Rear
-
0.69% fail on
Drive shafts
(88% better than other 1996 cars)
-
0.69% fail on
Front drive shafts
(88% better than other 1996 cars)
- 0.69% fail on Constant velocity joints (88% better than other 1996 cars)
-
0.69% fail on
Front drive shafts
(88% better than other 1996 cars)
- 0.35% fail on General condition
-
0.35% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.35% fail on Pins / bushes
-
1.7% fail on
Anti-roll bars
-
4.2% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(67% better than other 1996 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Washers
- 1.0% fail on Wipers (84% better than other 1996 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Windscreen
-
3.8% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 3.8% fail on Registration plate
-
1.7% fail on
Road wheels
- 1.7% fail on Attachment (5 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Seat belts
(79% better than other 1996 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Requirements (4 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Condition
-
1.0% fail on
Body and structure
(81% better than other 1996 cars)
- 0.69% fail on Body condition
-
0.35% fail on
Doors
- 0.35% fail on Drivers
