2001 Mazda Tribute MOT Results

Mazda Tribute, registered in 2001

51.0% pass rate

from 263 tests between October 2010 and September 2011

More MoT Results

The MoT Files: MoT Data FAQs

All Mazda MoT results

Mazda Tribute MoT results

Test results by year of registration

How cars perform in their first MoT

The Top 50 models

The full story behind the data

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2001 cars and highlighted areas where the Mazda Tribute is unusually good or bad.

26% fail on Lighting and signalling
- 12% fail on Registration plate (68% worse than other 2001 cars)
- 11% fail on Position lamps (93% worse than other 2001 cars)
  - 11% fail on Front lamps (100% worse than other 2001 cars)
  - 0.38% fail on All position lamps
- 6.5% fail on Headlamps
  - 6.5% fail on Headlamp
- 4.6% fail on Headlamp aim
- 3.0% fail on Stop lamp
- 1.9% fail on Direction indicators
  - 1.9% fail on Flashing type
    - 1.1% fail on Direction indicators
    - 0.76% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.38% fail on Fog lamp
  - 0.38% fail on Fog lamp
15% fail on Brakes
- 12% fail on Hydraulic systems (110% worse than other 2001 cars)
  - 12% fail on Components (120% worse than other 2001 cars)
    - 9.1% fail on Hoses (7 times worse than other 2001 cars)
    - 3.0% fail on Pipes
    - 0.76% fail on Reservoirs (6 times worse than other 2001 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Brake performance (81% better than other 2001 cars)
  - 0.76% fail on Front wheels
  - 0.76% fail on Service brake performance
  - 0.76% fail on Parking brake performance (82% better than other 2001 cars)
- 1.1% fail on ABS
- 1.1% fail on Hub components
  - 0.76% fail on Brake discs
  - 0.38% fail on Brake pads
- 0.38% fail on Parking brake
  - 0.38% fail on Condition
13% fail on Suspension
- 5.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
  - 4.2% fail on Linkage
  - 1.1% fail on Pins / bushes
- 3.0% fail on Suspension arms
  - 3.0% fail on Pins / bushes
- 1.9% fail on Coil springs
  - 1.9% fail on Condition
- 1.5% fail on Drive shafts
  - 1.5% fail on Front drive shafts
    - 1.5% fail on Constant velocity joints
- 0.76% fail on Wheel bearings
  - 0.76% fail on Front
- 0.76% fail on Front suspension joints
- 0.38% fail on Tie bars / rods
  - 0.38% fail on Pins / bushes
- 0.38% fail on Shock absorbers
  - 0.38% fail on Condition
13% fail on Fuel and exhaust (76% worse than other 2001 cars)
- 11% fail on Exhaust system (140% worse than other 2001 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Spark ignition
  - 3.0% fail on Catalyst
- 1.1% fail on Fuel system
  - 1.1% fail on System
6.8% fail on Steering
- 6.5% fail on Steering system
  - 5.7% fail on Track rod end
  - 1.1% fail on Ball joint
- 0.38% fail on Locking devices
6.1% fail on Driver's view of the road
- 5.3% fail on Wipers
- 0.38% fail on Windscreen
- 0.38% fail on Washers
3.8% fail on Tyres (63% better than other 2001 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Tread depth (68% better than other 2001 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Condition
- 0.38% fail on Size / type
3.0% fail on Registration plates and VIN
- 3.0% fail on Registration plate
2.3% fail on Body and structure
- 1.9% fail on Doors (7 times worse than other 2001 cars)
  - 1.1% fail on Passengers front (10 times worse than other 2001 cars)
  - 0.76% fail on Drivers (6 times worse than other 2001 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Body condition
0.76% fail on Seat belts
- 0.38% fail on Requirements
- 0.38% fail on Condition
0.38% fail on Towbars
- 0.38% fail on Vehicle structure
0.38% fail on Road wheels
- 0.38% fail on Attachment

Read the Honest John Review

Mazda Tribute 2001
SUV, yet car-like drive. Generally reliable.

Honest John's Newsletter

Recently Recommended

Most Recommended Garages

Connect with Honest John