Land Rover Defender 130, registered in 1999
59.3% pass rate
from 86 tests between October 2010 and September 2011
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Defender 130 is unusually good or bad.
-
24% fail on
Lighting and signalling
- 8.1% fail on Headlamp aim
-
7.0% fail on
Direction indicators
-
7.0% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.5% fail on Side repeaters
- 3.5% fail on Switch (51 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Individual lamps
-
7.0% fail on
Flashing type
- 5.8% fail on Registration plate
-
4.7% fail on
Position lamps
- 4.7% fail on Front lamps
-
3.5% fail on
Fog lamp
- 3.5% fail on Fog lamp
- 3.5% fail on Stop lamp
-
1.2% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.2% fail on Switch
-
1.2% fail on
Hazard warning
- 1.2% fail on Switch
-
14% fail on
Suspension
-
8.1% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 8.1% fail on Linkage
- 1.2% fail on Pins / bushes
-
3.5% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 3.5% fail on Condition
-
1.2% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.2% fail on Pins / bushes
-
1.2% fail on
Trailing arms
- 1.2% fail on Pins / bushes
-
1.2% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 1.2% fail on Front
- 1.2% fail on Rear
-
1.2% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 1.2% fail on Component mounting
-
8.1% fail on
Anti-roll bars
-
10% fail on
Fuel and exhaust
-
3.5% fail on
Compression ignition
(6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Turbo
- 1.2% fail on Non turbo
-
3.5% fail on
Fuel system
- 2.3% fail on System
- 1.2% fail on Cap
- 2.3% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.2% fail on
Spark ignition
- 1.2% fail on Pre 01 / 08 / 1975 visual
-
3.5% fail on
Compression ignition
(6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
7.0% fail on
Brakes
(66% better than other 1999 cars)
-
3.5% fail on
Brake performance
- 2.3% fail on Service brake performance
- 2.3% fail on Parking brake performance
-
2.3% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
2.3% fail on
Components
- 2.3% fail on Pipes
-
2.3% fail on
Components
-
2.3% fail on
Hub components
- 2.3% fail on Brake pads
-
3.5% fail on
Brake performance
-
7.0% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 4.7% fail on Wipers
- 2.3% fail on Washers
-
5.8% fail on
Steering
-
4.7% fail on
Steering system
- 2.3% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Track rod end
- 1.2% fail on Steering operation
-
1.2% fail on
Power steering
- 1.2% fail on Other components
-
4.7% fail on
Steering system
-
4.7% fail on
Tyres
- 3.5% fail on Condition
- 1.2% fail on Size / type
-
3.5% fail on
Seat belts
- 3.5% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
3.5% fail on
Body and structure
-
1.2% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 1.2% fail on Chassis
- 1.2% fail on Body condition
-
1.2% fail on
Doors
- 1.2% fail on Drivers
-
1.2% fail on
Vehicle structure
-
1.2% fail on
Towbars
- 1.2% fail on Towbar
-
1.2% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.2% fail on Registration plate
