Land Rover Defender 110, registered in 1994
51.0% pass rate
from 1,222 tests between October 2010 and September 2011
(8.6% better than other 1994 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1994 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Defender 110 is unusually good or bad.
-
32% fail on
Lighting and signalling
(20% worse than other 1994 cars)
-
9.1% fail on
Fog lamp
(2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 8.6% fail on Fog lamp (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 0.74% fail on Tell tale (160% worse than other 1994 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Switch
- 8.8% fail on Registration plate (34% worse than other 1994 cars)
-
6.7% fail on
Position lamps
- 5.1% fail on Front lamps
- 1.1% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.65% fail on All position lamps (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
-
6.4% fail on
Direction indicators
(87% worse than other 1994 cars)
-
6.4% fail on
Flashing type
(88% worse than other 1994 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Individual lamps (150% worse than other 1994 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Direction indicators (110% worse than other 1994 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.25% fail on Switch
-
6.4% fail on
Flashing type
(88% worse than other 1994 cars)
- 6.2% fail on Headlamp aim
- 6.1% fail on Stop lamp
-
5.9% fail on
Headlamps
- 5.6% fail on Headlamp
- 0.41% fail on Switch (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Hazard warning
(5 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Tell tale (25 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 0.57% fail on Switch
- 0.41% fail on Lamp
- 2.5% fail on Horn (130% worse than other 1994 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Rear reflectors (13 times worse than other 1994 cars)
-
9.1% fail on
Fog lamp
(2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
-
19% fail on
Suspension
(23% better than other 1994 cars)
-
5.8% fail on
Wheel bearings
(140% worse than other 1994 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Rear (160% worse than other 1994 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Front (130% worse than other 1994 cars)
-
5.8% fail on
Shock absorbers
(120% worse than other 1994 cars)
- 5.8% fail on Condition (120% worse than other 1994 cars)
-
5.1% fail on
Prescribed areas
(40% better than other 1994 cars)
- 4.6% fail on Component mounting (33% better than other 1994 cars)
- 0.57% fail on Spring mounting
- 0.082% fail on Subframe mounting
-
2.6% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.4% fail on Linkage
- 1.1% fail on Pins / bushes
- 0.16% fail on Attachment
- 0.082% fail on Condition
-
1.4% fail on
Axles
(9 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Swivel joints / housing (12 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 0.16% fail on King pins (11 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 0.082% fail on Clearance
-
0.98% fail on
Tie bars / rods
(3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 0.98% fail on Pins / bushes (5 times worse than other 1994 cars)
-
0.82% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.74% fail on Pins / bushes
- 0.082% fail on Attachment
-
0.82% fail on
Panhard rods
(19 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 0.74% fail on Pins / bushes (23 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 0.082% fail on Attachment
-
0.74% fail on
Suspension arms
(83% better than other 1994 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Pins / bushes (84% better than other 1994 cars)
- 0.082% fail on Attachment
-
0.57% fail on
Drive shafts
(89% better than other 1994 cars)
-
0.57% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
(25 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 0.57% fail on Universal joint (26 times worse than other 1994 cars)
-
0.57% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
(25 times worse than other 1994 cars)
-
0.41% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.33% fail on Pins / bushes
- 0.082% fail on Attachment
-
0.33% fail on
Coil springs
(85% better than other 1994 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Condition (92% better than other 1994 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Location
-
0.33% fail on
Torque / reaction arms
(9 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Pins / bushes (12 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Front suspension joints (90% better than other 1994 cars)
-
0.082% fail on
Fluid suspension
- 0.082% fail on Other components
-
5.8% fail on
Wheel bearings
(140% worse than other 1994 cars)
-
16% fail on
Steering
(180% worse than other 1994 cars)
-
13% fail on
Steering system
(180% worse than other 1994 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Drag link end (12 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 3.6% fail on Ball joint (7 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Track rod end (50% worse than other 1994 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Steering box (18 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 0.98% fail on Steering arm (6 times worse than other 1994 cars)
-
0.90% fail on
Free play
(2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 0.90% fail on Steering box (12 times worse than other 1994 cars)
-
0.74% fail on
Other components
(5 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Steering pivot point (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Steering component (15 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Steering damper (10 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Intermediate drop arm (5 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 0.082% fail on Lock stop
-
2.5% fail on
Power steering
(2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Other components (6 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Operation
- 0.25% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.16% fail on Pump
- 0.082% fail on Rams
-
0.90% fail on
Steering control
(2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
-
0.82% fail on
Steering coupling
(8 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 0.82% fail on Universal joint (8 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 0.082% fail on Steering shaft
-
0.82% fail on
Steering coupling
(8 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 0.57% fail on Locking devices (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 0.57% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Steering operation
-
13% fail on
Steering system
(180% worse than other 1994 cars)
-
15% fail on
Brakes
(26% better than other 1994 cars)
-
8.5% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
7.9% fail on
Components
- 7.2% fail on Pipes
- 0.57% fail on Hoses (78% better than other 1994 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Servos
- 0.082% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.41% fail on Leaks
- 0.25% fail on Operation
-
7.9% fail on
Components
-
4.8% fail on
Hub components
(83% worse than other 1994 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Brake pads (58% worse than other 1994 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Brake discs (160% worse than other 1994 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Brake calipers
- 0.082% fail on Brake drums
- 0.082% fail on Brake back plates
-
2.8% fail on
Brake performance
(75% better than other 1994 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Parking brake performance (61% better than other 1994 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Service brake performance (67% better than other 1994 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Front wheels (87% better than other 1994 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Rear wheels (92% better than other 1994 cars)
- 0.082% fail on Brake operation
-
1.1% fail on
Service brake control components
(200% worse than other 1994 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Pedal
(200% worse than other 1994 cars)
- 0.82% fail on Anti-slip (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Condition
-
1.1% fail on
Pedal
(200% worse than other 1994 cars)
-
0.98% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.98% fail on Condition
-
0.90% fail on
Prescribed areas
(140% worse than other 1994 cars)
- 0.90% fail on Master cylinder / servo mounting (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 0.082% fail on Park brake mechanism / associated mountings
- 0.082% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
-
0.33% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.25% fail on Linkage (15 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 0.082% fail on Lever
- 0.082% fail on Cable
-
0.082% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
-
0.082% fail on
Components
- 0.082% fail on Servos
-
0.082% fail on
Components
- 0.082% fail on Restricted movement
-
8.5% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
12% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 6.9% fail on Washers
- 5.9% fail on Wipers
- 0.82% fail on Windscreen
- 0.49% fail on Mirrors
- 0.082% fail on Bonnet
-
11% fail on
Body and structure
(72% worse than other 1994 cars)
-
5.1% fail on
Vehicle structure
(140% worse than other 1994 cars)
- 5.1% fail on Chassis (140% worse than other 1994 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Body condition
-
2.1% fail on
Doors
(2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 0.98% fail on Drivers (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 0.82% fail on Passengers front (180% worse than other 1994 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Passengers other (7 times worse than other 1994 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Seats
- 0.25% fail on Drivers
- 0.16% fail on Body security
- 0.082% fail on Spare wheel
-
5.1% fail on
Vehicle structure
(140% worse than other 1994 cars)
-
8.8% fail on
Fuel and exhaust
(36% better than other 1994 cars)
- 6.6% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.6% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.90% fail on System
- 0.57% fail on Tank (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Pipe
- 0.082% fail on Cap
-
0.82% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.74% fail on Turbo
- 0.082% fail on Non turbo
-
0.25% fail on
Spark ignition
(96% better than other 1994 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Non catalyst
-
6.1% fail on
Towbars
(17 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 5.6% fail on Vehicle structure (20 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 0.57% fail on Towbar (7 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 0.082% fail on Adjustable towbar
-
5.2% fail on
Seat belts
(27% better than other 1994 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Prescribed areas (79% better than other 1994 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Requirements (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Tyres
(66% better than other 1994 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Condition (47% better than other 1994 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Tread depth (79% better than other 1994 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Size / type
-
3.4% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
(70% worse than other 1994 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Registration plate (70% worse than other 1994 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Road wheels
- 0.25% fail on Attachment
