1994 Land Rover Defender 110 MOT Results

Land Rover Defender 110, registered in 1994

51.0% pass rate

from 1,222 tests between October 2010 and September 2011

(8.6% better than other 1994 cars)

Pass rate by mileage

More MoT Results

The MoT Files: MoT Data FAQs

All Land Rover MoT results

Land Rover Defender 110 MoT results

Classic Land Rover Defender 110 MoT results

Test results by year of registration

How cars perform in their first MoT

The Top 50 models

The full story behind the data

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1994 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Defender 110 is unusually good or bad.

32% fail on Lighting and signalling (20% worse than other 1994 cars)
- 9.1% fail on Fog lamp (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
  - 8.6% fail on Fog lamp (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
  - 0.74% fail on Tell tale (160% worse than other 1994 cars)
  - 0.16% fail on Switch
- 8.8% fail on Registration plate (34% worse than other 1994 cars)
- 6.7% fail on Position lamps
  - 5.1% fail on Front lamps
  - 1.1% fail on Rear lamps
  - 0.65% fail on All position lamps (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 6.4% fail on Direction indicators (87% worse than other 1994 cars)
  - 6.4% fail on Flashing type (88% worse than other 1994 cars)
    - 3.5% fail on Individual lamps (150% worse than other 1994 cars)
    - 2.0% fail on Direction indicators (110% worse than other 1994 cars)
    - 1.2% fail on Side repeaters
    - 0.25% fail on Switch
- 6.2% fail on Headlamp aim
- 6.1% fail on Stop lamp
- 5.9% fail on Headlamps
  - 5.6% fail on Headlamp
  - 0.41% fail on Switch (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Hazard warning (5 times worse than other 1994 cars)
  - 1.6% fail on Tell tale (25 times worse than other 1994 cars)
  - 0.57% fail on Switch
  - 0.41% fail on Lamp
- 2.5% fail on Horn (130% worse than other 1994 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Rear reflectors (13 times worse than other 1994 cars)
19% fail on Suspension (23% better than other 1994 cars)
- 5.8% fail on Wheel bearings (140% worse than other 1994 cars)
  - 3.8% fail on Rear (160% worse than other 1994 cars)
  - 2.4% fail on Front (130% worse than other 1994 cars)
- 5.8% fail on Shock absorbers (120% worse than other 1994 cars)
  - 5.8% fail on Condition (120% worse than other 1994 cars)
- 5.1% fail on Prescribed areas (40% better than other 1994 cars)
  - 4.6% fail on Component mounting (33% better than other 1994 cars)
  - 0.57% fail on Spring mounting
  - 0.082% fail on Subframe mounting
- 2.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
  - 1.4% fail on Linkage
  - 1.1% fail on Pins / bushes
  - 0.16% fail on Attachment
  - 0.082% fail on Condition
- 1.4% fail on Axles (9 times worse than other 1994 cars)
  - 1.1% fail on Swivel joints / housing (12 times worse than other 1994 cars)
  - 0.16% fail on King pins (11 times worse than other 1994 cars)
  - 0.082% fail on Clearance
- 0.98% fail on Tie bars / rods (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
  - 0.98% fail on Pins / bushes (5 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 0.82% fail on Trailing arms
  - 0.74% fail on Pins / bushes
  - 0.082% fail on Attachment
- 0.82% fail on Panhard rods (19 times worse than other 1994 cars)
  - 0.74% fail on Pins / bushes (23 times worse than other 1994 cars)
  - 0.082% fail on Attachment
- 0.74% fail on Suspension arms (83% better than other 1994 cars)
  - 0.65% fail on Pins / bushes (84% better than other 1994 cars)
  - 0.082% fail on Attachment
- 0.57% fail on Drive shafts (89% better than other 1994 cars)
  - 0.57% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension (25 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    - 0.57% fail on Universal joint (26 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Radius arms
  - 0.33% fail on Pins / bushes
  - 0.082% fail on Attachment
- 0.33% fail on Coil springs (85% better than other 1994 cars)
  - 0.16% fail on Condition (92% better than other 1994 cars)
  - 0.16% fail on Location
- 0.33% fail on Torque / reaction arms (9 times worse than other 1994 cars)
  - 0.33% fail on Pins / bushes (12 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Front suspension joints (90% better than other 1994 cars)
- 0.082% fail on Fluid suspension
  - 0.082% fail on Other components
16% fail on Steering (180% worse than other 1994 cars)
- 13% fail on Steering system (180% worse than other 1994 cars)
  - 3.9% fail on Drag link end (12 times worse than other 1994 cars)
  - 3.6% fail on Ball joint (7 times worse than other 1994 cars)
  - 3.4% fail on Track rod end (50% worse than other 1994 cars)
  - 1.2% fail on Steering box (18 times worse than other 1994 cars)
  - 0.98% fail on Steering arm (6 times worse than other 1994 cars)
  - 0.90% fail on Free play (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    - 0.90% fail on Steering box (12 times worse than other 1994 cars)
  - 0.74% fail on Other components (5 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    - 0.49% fail on Steering pivot point (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    - 0.25% fail on Steering component (15 times worse than other 1994 cars)
  - 0.25% fail on Steering damper (10 times worse than other 1994 cars)
  - 0.16% fail on Intermediate drop arm (5 times worse than other 1994 cars)
  - 0.082% fail on Lock stop
- 2.5% fail on Power steering (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
  - 2.0% fail on Other components (6 times worse than other 1994 cars)
  - 0.25% fail on Operation
  - 0.25% fail on Pipes and hoses
  - 0.16% fail on Pump
  - 0.082% fail on Rams
- 0.90% fail on Steering control (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
  - 0.82% fail on Steering coupling (8 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    - 0.82% fail on Universal joint (8 times worse than other 1994 cars)
  - 0.082% fail on Steering shaft
- 0.57% fail on Locking devices (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 0.57% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Steering operation
15% fail on Brakes (26% better than other 1994 cars)
- 8.5% fail on Hydraulic systems
  - 7.9% fail on Components
    - 7.2% fail on Pipes
    - 0.57% fail on Hoses (78% better than other 1994 cars)
    - 0.16% fail on Servos
    - 0.082% fail on Reservoirs
  - 0.41% fail on Leaks
  - 0.25% fail on Operation
- 4.8% fail on Hub components (83% worse than other 1994 cars)
  - 2.9% fail on Brake pads (58% worse than other 1994 cars)
  - 1.8% fail on Brake discs (160% worse than other 1994 cars)
  - 0.33% fail on Brake calipers
  - 0.082% fail on Brake drums
  - 0.082% fail on Brake back plates
- 2.8% fail on Brake performance (75% better than other 1994 cars)
  - 2.0% fail on Parking brake performance (61% better than other 1994 cars)
  - 0.65% fail on Service brake performance (67% better than other 1994 cars)
  - 0.41% fail on Front wheels (87% better than other 1994 cars)
  - 0.41% fail on Rear wheels (92% better than other 1994 cars)
  - 0.082% fail on Brake operation
- 1.1% fail on Service brake control components (200% worse than other 1994 cars)
  - 1.1% fail on Pedal (200% worse than other 1994 cars)
    - 0.82% fail on Anti-slip (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    - 0.33% fail on Condition
- 0.98% fail on Parking brake
  - 0.98% fail on Condition
- 0.90% fail on Prescribed areas (140% worse than other 1994 cars)
  - 0.90% fail on Master cylinder / servo mounting (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
  - 0.082% fail on Park brake mechanism / associated mountings
  - 0.082% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
- 0.33% fail on Mechanical components
  - 0.25% fail on Linkage (15 times worse than other 1994 cars)
  - 0.082% fail on Lever
  - 0.082% fail on Cable
- 0.082% fail on Air and vacuum systems
  - 0.082% fail on Components
    - 0.082% fail on Servos
- 0.082% fail on Restricted movement
12% fail on Driver's view of the road
- 6.9% fail on Washers
- 5.9% fail on Wipers
- 0.82% fail on Windscreen
- 0.49% fail on Mirrors
- 0.082% fail on Bonnet
11% fail on Body and structure (72% worse than other 1994 cars)
- 5.1% fail on Vehicle structure (140% worse than other 1994 cars)
  - 5.1% fail on Chassis (140% worse than other 1994 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Body condition
- 2.1% fail on Doors (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
  - 0.98% fail on Drivers (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
  - 0.82% fail on Passengers front (180% worse than other 1994 cars)
  - 0.41% fail on Passengers other (7 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Seats
  - 0.25% fail on Drivers
- 0.16% fail on Body security
- 0.082% fail on Spare wheel
8.8% fail on Fuel and exhaust (36% better than other 1994 cars)
- 6.6% fail on Exhaust system
- 1.6% fail on Fuel system
  - 0.90% fail on System
  - 0.57% fail on Tank (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
  - 0.16% fail on Pipe
  - 0.082% fail on Cap
- 0.82% fail on Compression ignition
  - 0.74% fail on Turbo
  - 0.082% fail on Non turbo
- 0.25% fail on Spark ignition (96% better than other 1994 cars)
  - 0.25% fail on Non catalyst
6.1% fail on Towbars (17 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 5.6% fail on Vehicle structure (20 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 0.57% fail on Towbar (7 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 0.082% fail on Adjustable towbar
5.2% fail on Seat belts (27% better than other 1994 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Prescribed areas (79% better than other 1994 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Requirements (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
3.4% fail on Tyres (66% better than other 1994 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Condition (47% better than other 1994 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Tread depth (79% better than other 1994 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Size / type
3.4% fail on Registration plates and VIN (70% worse than other 1994 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Registration plate (70% worse than other 1994 cars)
0.25% fail on Road wheels
- 0.25% fail on Attachment

Honest John's Newsletter

Recently Recommended

Most Recommended Garages

Connect with Honest John