Hyundai Lantra, registered in 1995
41.3% pass rate
from 310 tests between October 2010 and September 2011
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Lantra is unusually good or bad.
-
32% fail on
Suspension
(32% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
14% fail on
Prescribed areas
(89% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 13% fail on Component mounting (120% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.97% fail on Spring mounting
-
5.8% fail on
Drive shafts
-
5.8% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 5.8% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
5.8% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
5.5% fail on
Wheel bearings
(99% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Rear
- 2.3% fail on Front
-
4.5% fail on
Suspension arms
- 4.2% fail on Pins / bushes
- 0.32% fail on Condition
-
3.5% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 3.5% fail on Condition
-
1.9% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.9% fail on Linkage
- 1.3% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.65% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.32% fail on Condition
- 0.32% fail on Location
-
0.65% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.65% fail on Condition
-
0.32% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.32% fail on Pins / bushes
-
0.32% fail on
Panhard rods
- 0.32% fail on Condition
-
14% fail on
Prescribed areas
(89% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
22% fail on
Lighting and signalling
- 8.7% fail on Registration plate
-
8.1% fail on
Position lamps
- 7.4% fail on Front lamps
- 0.32% fail on All position lamps
- 0.32% fail on Rear lamps
- 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim
-
3.2% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.9% fail on Headlamp
- 0.32% fail on Matched pair
-
2.3% fail on
Fog lamp
- 1.9% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.32% fail on Switch
- 2.3% fail on Stop lamp (61% better than other 1995 cars)
-
0.65% fail on
Direction indicators
(82% better than other 1995 cars)
-
0.65% fail on
Flashing type
(82% better than other 1995 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Direction indicators
- 0.32% fail on Individual lamps
-
0.65% fail on
Flashing type
(82% better than other 1995 cars)
-
0.32% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.32% fail on Switch
- 0.32% fail on Horn
-
21% fail on
Brakes
-
13% fail on
Brake performance
- 6.1% fail on Front wheels (81% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 6.1% fail on Rear wheels
- 2.9% fail on Parking brake performance
- 2.3% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.32% fail on Brake operation
-
9.4% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
9.0% fail on
Components
- 8.1% fail on Pipes
- 0.97% fail on Hoses
- 0.97% fail on Leaks
-
9.0% fail on
Components
-
2.3% fail on
Hub components
- 1.6% fail on Brake pads
- 0.32% fail on Brake drums
- 0.32% fail on Brake discs
-
1.6% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.6% fail on Condition
-
0.65% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.65% fail on
Pedal
- 0.32% fail on Condition
- 0.32% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.65% fail on
Pedal
-
0.32% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.32% fail on Cable
- 0.32% fail on Restricted movement
-
13% fail on
Brake performance
-
17% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 10% fail on Washers (94% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 7.7% fail on Wipers
- 0.32% fail on Windscreen
- 0.32% fail on Mirrors
-
12% fail on
Fuel and exhaust
-
10% fail on
Spark ignition
- 10% fail on Catalyst
- 3.2% fail on Exhaust system (58% better than other 1995 cars)
-
0.65% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.32% fail on Tank
- 0.32% fail on System
-
10% fail on
Spark ignition
-
12% fail on
Tyres
- 8.4% fail on Tread depth
- 5.2% fail on Condition
-
6.1% fail on
Steering
-
5.8% fail on
Steering system
- 4.8% fail on Track rod end
- 0.65% fail on Ball joint
- 0.32% fail on Steering rack
-
0.32% fail on
Steering control
- 0.32% fail on Steering column
-
0.32% fail on
Power steering
- 0.32% fail on Other components
-
5.8% fail on
Steering system
-
5.8% fail on
Body and structure
- 3.9% fail on Body condition
-
1.3% fail on
Doors
- 0.97% fail on Drivers
- 0.32% fail on Passengers front
-
0.65% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.65% fail on Chassis
-
5.5% fail on
Seat belts
- 3.5% fail on Prescribed areas
- 2.6% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 2.9% fail on Registration plate
Read the Honest John Review
-
Hyundai Lantra 1995
Reliable and cheap. Beat the BMW 3-Series in a JD Power Customer Satisfaction Survey. -
Hyundai Lantra 1991
Inexpensive saloon that uses reliable Mitsubishi-sourced power trains.
