Ford Maverick, registered in 1999
50.4% pass rate
from 117 tests between October 2010 and September 2011
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Maverick is unusually good or bad.
-
25% fail on
Suspension
-
22% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 20% fail on Linkage (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Pins / bushes (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.85% fail on
Tie bars / rods
- 0.85% fail on Attachment
-
0.85% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.85% fail on Front
-
0.85% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.85% fail on Condition
-
22% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
24% fail on
Brakes
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
- 8.5% fail on Rear wheels
- 6.8% fail on Parking brake performance
- 3.4% fail on Front wheels
- 0.85% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.85% fail on Brake operation
-
12% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
10% fail on
Components
- 9.4% fail on Pipes
- 1.7% fail on Hoses
- 4.3% fail on Leaks (11 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.85% fail on Operation
-
10% fail on
Components
-
6.8% fail on
Hub components
- 6.0% fail on Brake pads
- 0.85% fail on Brake drums
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
-
21% fail on
Lighting and signalling
- 6.8% fail on Stop lamp
- 6.8% fail on Headlamp aim
-
3.4% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.4% fail on Headlamp
-
3.4% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.4% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.7% fail on Individual lamps
- 1.7% fail on Side repeaters
-
3.4% fail on
Flashing type
-
2.6% fail on
Position lamps
- 1.7% fail on Front lamps
- 0.85% fail on Rear lamps
-
2.6% fail on
Fog lamp
- 2.6% fail on Fog lamp
-
18% fail on
Fuel and exhaust
- 14% fail on Exhaust system (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Fuel system
- 2.6% fail on Pipe (25 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.85% fail on Cap
-
2.6% fail on
Spark ignition
- 2.6% fail on Catalyst
-
2.6% fail on
Compression ignition
(4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Turbo (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
11% fail on
Body and structure
(3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 6.8% fail on Body condition (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 2.6% fail on Chassis
- 0.85% fail on Body security
-
0.85% fail on
Doors
- 0.85% fail on Passengers other
-
9.4% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 4.3% fail on Wipers
- 2.6% fail on Washers
- 1.7% fail on Mirrors
- 0.85% fail on Windscreen
-
6.8% fail on
Tyres
- 6.0% fail on Tread depth
- 0.85% fail on Condition
-
3.4% fail on
Seat belts
- 3.4% fail on Prescribed areas
-
2.6% fail on
Steering
-
1.7% fail on
Steering system
- 1.7% fail on Track rod end
-
0.85% fail on
Power steering
- 0.85% fail on Drive system
- 0.85% fail on Locking devices
-
1.7% fail on
Steering system
-
2.6% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 2.6% fail on Registration plate
