Ford Maverick, registered in 1996
42.4% pass rate
from 1,282 tests between October 2010 and September 2011
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Maverick is unusually good or bad.
-
32% fail on
Suspension
(25% worse than other 1996 cars)
-
22% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(5 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 17% fail on Linkage (5 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Pins / bushes (4 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.94% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.078% fail on Presence
-
5.9% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 5.3% fail on Component mounting
- 0.39% fail on Subframe mounting (66% better than other 1996 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Spring mounting
-
4.4% fail on
Shock absorbers
(72% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Condition (72% worse than other 1996 cars)
-
4.0% fail on
Drive shafts
(32% better than other 1996 cars)
-
4.0% fail on
Front drive shafts
(31% better than other 1996 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Constant velocity joints (34% better than other 1996 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Drive shafts (39 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
4.0% fail on
Front drive shafts
(31% better than other 1996 cars)
-
3.5% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 3.5% fail on Front (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Suspension arms
(68% better than other 1996 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Pins / bushes (73% better than other 1996 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Attachment
- 0.16% fail on Condition
- 1.2% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.86% fail on
Tie bars / rods
(2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.78% fail on Pins / bushes (3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.078% fail on Condition
- 0.31% fail on General condition (8 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Coil springs
(94% better than other 1996 cars)
- 0.078% fail on Condition
- 0.078% fail on Location
-
0.078% fail on
Torsion bars
- 0.078% fail on Attachment
-
0.078% fail on
Bonded suspension
- 0.078% fail on Condition
-
0.078% fail on
Torque / reaction arms
- 0.078% fail on Attachment
- 0.078% fail on Front suspension locking devices
-
22% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(5 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
30% fail on
Brakes
(32% worse than other 1996 cars)
-
16% fail on
Brake performance
(32% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 7.3% fail on Parking brake performance
- 6.6% fail on Rear wheels
- 5.9% fail on Front wheels (74% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.55% fail on Brake operation (7 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
16% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(60% worse than other 1996 cars)
-
15% fail on
Components
(55% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 11% fail on Pipes (84% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Hoses
- 1.1% fail on Valves
- 0.78% fail on Reservoirs (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.94% fail on Leaks (150% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.62% fail on Operation (190% worse than other 1996 cars)
-
15% fail on
Components
(55% worse than other 1996 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Hub components
- 2.3% fail on Brake pads
- 0.31% fail on Brake discs
- 0.31% fail on Brake calipers
- 0.078% fail on Brake drums
-
1.8% fail on
Prescribed areas
(7 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Master cylinder / servo mounting (12 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Actuating linkage mounting (10 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.2% fail on Condition
- 0.47% fail on Restricted movement
- 0.39% fail on ABS
-
0.31% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.31% fail on
Pedal
- 0.31% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.31% fail on
Pedal
-
0.078% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.078% fail on Lever
-
16% fail on
Brake performance
(32% worse than other 1996 cars)
-
24% fail on
Lighting and signalling
(15% better than other 1996 cars)
- 8.5% fail on Headlamp aim
-
6.5% fail on
Position lamps
- 5.6% fail on Front lamps
- 0.47% fail on All position lamps
- 0.47% fail on Rear lamps
- 5.4% fail on Stop lamp
- 3.9% fail on Registration plate (48% better than other 1996 cars)
-
3.6% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.6% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.6% fail on Side repeaters
- 1.2% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.78% fail on Direction indicators
- 0.078% fail on Tell tales
-
3.6% fail on
Flashing type
-
3.3% fail on
Headlamps
(32% better than other 1996 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Headlamp
- 0.078% fail on Matched pair
- 0.078% fail on Dipswitch
-
2.7% fail on
Fog lamp
- 2.7% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.47% fail on Tell tale
- 0.94% fail on Horn
-
0.16% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.078% fail on Lamp
- 0.078% fail on Tell tale
-
17% fail on
Fuel and exhaust
(19% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 12% fail on Exhaust system (66% worse than other 1996 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Fuel system
(77% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Pipe (6 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.47% fail on Tank (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.31% fail on System
- 0.16% fail on Hose
-
2.3% fail on
Compression ignition
(2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Turbo (3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Spark ignition
(74% better than other 1996 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Catalyst (73% better than other 1996 cars)
-
15% fail on
Seat belts
(130% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 14% fail on Prescribed areas (140% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.78% fail on Condition
- 0.55% fail on Requirements (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.078% fail on Attachment
-
14% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 9.1% fail on Washers (75% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Wipers (27% better than other 1996 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Windscreen
- 0.78% fail on Mirrors
-
12% fail on
Body and structure
(120% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 6.9% fail on Body condition (150% worse than other 1996 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Vehicle structure
(160% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Chassis (160% worse than other 1996 cars)
-
0.47% fail on
Seats
- 0.47% fail on Drivers
- 0.31% fail on Body security
-
8.0% fail on
Steering
(44% worse than other 1996 cars)
-
6.9% fail on
Steering system
(50% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 4.5% fail on Track rod end (75% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Drag link end (4 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
0.78% fail on
Other components
(9 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.78% fail on Steering pivot point (11 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.55% fail on Ball joint
-
0.31% fail on
Free play
- 0.31% fail on Steering box (11 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Steering box (6 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Intermediate drop arm (13 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.078% fail on Steering arm
-
1.1% fail on
Power steering
- 0.70% fail on Other components (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Operation
- 0.078% fail on Drive system
- 0.078% fail on Pump
- 0.16% fail on Steering operation
- 0.16% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.078% fail on Locking devices
-
6.9% fail on
Steering system
(50% worse than other 1996 cars)
-
7.0% fail on
Tyres
(39% better than other 1996 cars)
- 6.4% fail on Tread depth
- 0.86% fail on Condition (77% better than other 1996 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Size / type
-
2.0% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 2.0% fail on Registration plate
-
0.86% fail on
Road wheels
- 0.86% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Towbars
- 0.078% fail on Towbar
- 0.078% fail on Vehicle structure
Read the Honest John Review
-
Ford Maverick 1993
Decent off-road ability. Long-wheelbase version seats seven.
