Ford Maverick, registered in 1995
42.2% pass rate
from 1,509 tests between October 2010 and September 2011
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Maverick is unusually good or bad.
-
32% fail on
Suspension
(31% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
20% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 15% fail on Linkage (6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Pins / bushes (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Attachment (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
7.9% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 6.5% fail on Component mounting
- 1.9% fail on Spring mounting (170% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Subframe mounting (83% better than other 1995 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.7% fail on Pins / bushes
- 0.46% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Condition
- 4.0% fail on Front suspension joints (120% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
3.6% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 3.6% fail on Condition
-
2.2% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 2.2% fail on Front (120% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Drive shafts
(67% better than other 1995 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Front drive shafts
(68% better than other 1995 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Constant velocity joints (68% better than other 1995 cars)
-
0.066% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.066% fail on Universal joint
-
1.7% fail on
Front drive shafts
(68% better than other 1995 cars)
-
0.99% fail on
Tie bars / rods
(4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.86% fail on Pins / bushes (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.066% fail on Condition
- 0.066% fail on Attachment
-
0.46% fail on
Coil springs
(81% better than other 1995 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Location
- 0.13% fail on Condition (94% better than other 1995 cars)
-
0.33% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.27% fail on Pins / bushes
- 0.066% fail on Attachment
- 0.27% fail on General condition (6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Torsion bars
(13 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Attachment (16 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
0.066% fail on
Leaf springs
- 0.066% fail on Anchor bracket
-
0.066% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.066% fail on Pins / bushes
-
0.066% fail on
Panhard rods
- 0.066% fail on Condition
- 0.066% fail on Front suspension locking devices
-
20% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
30% fail on
Brakes
(40% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
18% fail on
Brake performance
(60% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 8.7% fail on Parking brake performance (61% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 7.4% fail on Rear wheels (38% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 6.8% fail on Front wheels (100% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Service brake performance (76% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.66% fail on Brake operation (6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
14% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(45% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
13% fail on
Components
(44% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 10% fail on Pipes (66% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Hoses
- 1.1% fail on Valves
- 0.46% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.80% fail on Leaks
- 0.46% fail on Operation
-
13% fail on
Components
(44% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Prescribed areas
(10 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Master cylinder / servo mounting (14 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Park brake mechanism / associated mountings
-
3.0% fail on
Hub components
- 2.5% fail on Brake pads
- 0.27% fail on Brake drums (6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Brake calipers
- 0.13% fail on Brake discs (83% better than other 1995 cars)
- 0.066% fail on Wheel cylinder
-
1.5% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.5% fail on Condition
- 0.73% fail on Restricted movement (180% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
0.53% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.53% fail on
Pedal
- 0.40% fail on Condition
- 0.13% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.53% fail on
Pedal
-
0.13% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.066% fail on Warning
- 0.066% fail on Operation
-
0.066% fail on
Components
- 0.066% fail on Hoses
-
18% fail on
Brake performance
(60% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
25% fail on
Lighting and signalling
-
7.0% fail on
Position lamps
- 6.0% fail on Front lamps
- 0.99% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.33% fail on All position lamps
- 6.6% fail on Headlamp aim
- 5.2% fail on Registration plate (26% better than other 1995 cars)
- 5.0% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.6% fail on
Fog lamp
(60% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 3.6% fail on Fog lamp (73% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Tell tale
-
3.0% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.0% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.3% fail on Side repeaters
- 1.1% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.80% fail on Direction indicators
- 0.066% fail on Switch
-
3.0% fail on
Flashing type
-
3.0% fail on
Headlamps
(37% better than other 1995 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Headlamp (38% better than other 1995 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Matched pair
- 0.066% fail on Switch
- 0.20% fail on Horn (79% better than other 1995 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.13% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.066% fail on Lamp
- 0.066% fail on Switch
-
7.0% fail on
Position lamps
-
17% fail on
Fuel and exhaust
(22% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 13% fail on Exhaust system (74% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Fuel system
(92% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Pipe (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.60% fail on System
- 0.27% fail on Tank
- 0.13% fail on Hose
-
2.3% fail on
Compression ignition
(2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Turbo (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Spark ignition
(82% better than other 1995 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Catalyst (82% better than other 1995 cars)
-
15% fail on
Seat belts
(130% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 14% fail on Prescribed areas (150% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Condition
- 0.13% fail on Requirements
- 0.13% fail on Attachment
-
14% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 6.8% fail on Wipers
- 6.6% fail on Washers
- 1.4% fail on Windscreen
- 0.60% fail on Mirrors
-
10% fail on
Body and structure
(87% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 7.0% fail on Body condition (140% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Vehicle structure
(110% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Chassis (110% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Body security
-
0.20% fail on
Seats
- 0.20% fail on Drivers
-
7.9% fail on
Steering
(34% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
6.1% fail on
Steering system
- 3.3% fail on Track rod end
- 1.3% fail on Ball joint (190% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.86% fail on Drag link end (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
0.60% fail on
Other components
(5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.60% fail on Steering pivot point (6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Steering arm
-
0.13% fail on
Free play
- 0.13% fail on Steering box
- 0.13% fail on Steering box
-
1.5% fail on
Power steering
(120% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Other components (200% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.27% fail on Operation
- 0.20% fail on Pump
- 0.066% fail on Drive system
- 0.33% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Locking devices
-
0.13% fail on
Steering control
- 0.066% fail on Steering column
-
0.066% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.066% fail on Universal joint
- 0.13% fail on Steering operation
-
6.1% fail on
Steering system
-
7.1% fail on
Tyres
(35% better than other 1995 cars)
- 5.8% fail on Tread depth (24% better than other 1995 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Condition (65% better than other 1995 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Size / type
-
1.5% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.5% fail on Registration plate
-
1.3% fail on
Road wheels
(160% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Attachment (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.066% fail on Condition
-
0.27% fail on
Towbars
- 0.20% fail on Vehicle structure
- 0.066% fail on Towbar
Read the Honest John Review
-
Ford Maverick 1993
Decent off-road ability. Long-wheelbase version seats seven.
