Daihatsu Sportrak, registered in 1996
49.6% pass rate
from 446 tests between October 2010 and September 2011
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 cars and highlighted areas where the Daihatsu Sportrak is unusually good or bad.
-
23% fail on
Lighting and signalling
-
8.7% fail on
Position lamps
- 7.4% fail on Front lamps
- 0.90% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.45% fail on All position lamps
- 7.6% fail on Registration plate
- 7.0% fail on Stop lamp
- 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim (49% better than other 1996 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Fog lamp
- 2.2% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.22% fail on Tell tale
-
2.0% fail on
Headlamps
(58% better than other 1996 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Headlamp (57% better than other 1996 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Switch
-
1.8% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.8% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.1% fail on Direction indicators
- 0.45% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.22% fail on Side repeaters
-
1.8% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.67% fail on Horn
-
0.45% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.45% fail on Lamp
- 0.22% fail on Rear reflectors
-
8.7% fail on
Position lamps
-
20% fail on
Fuel and exhaust
(41% worse than other 1996 cars)
-
13% fail on
Spark ignition
(77% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 13% fail on Catalyst (78% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 7.6% fail on Exhaust system
-
2.7% fail on
Fuel system
- 2.2% fail on Pipe (10 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Cap
- 0.22% fail on System
-
13% fail on
Spark ignition
(77% worse than other 1996 cars)
-
15% fail on
Suspension
(39% better than other 1996 cars)
-
9.4% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 6.3% fail on Spring mounting (11 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 3.6% fail on Component mounting
-
2.7% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 2.7% fail on Front (190% worse than other 1996 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Leaf springs
(35 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Condition (58 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
0.45% fail on
Pins and bushes
(17 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Shackle
- 0.22% fail on Anchor
- 0.22% fail on Shackle bracket
- 0.22% fail on Securing bolts
-
1.1% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 1.1% fail on Condition
-
0.67% fail on
Suspension arms
(87% better than other 1996 cars)
- 0.67% fail on Pins / bushes (86% better than other 1996 cars)
-
0.67% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(80% better than other 1996 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Pins / bushes
- 0.22% fail on Attachment
-
0.45% fail on
Drive shafts
(92% better than other 1996 cars)
-
0.45% fail on
Front drive shafts
(92% better than other 1996 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Constant velocity joints (92% better than other 1996 cars)
-
0.45% fail on
Front drive shafts
(92% better than other 1996 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Front suspension joints
-
9.4% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
13% fail on
Brakes
(42% better than other 1996 cars)
-
6.1% fail on
Brake performance
(51% better than other 1996 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Front wheels
- 1.6% fail on Rear wheels (74% better than other 1996 cars)
- 0.90% fail on Parking brake performance (86% better than other 1996 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.22% fail on Brake operation
-
5.4% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(45% better than other 1996 cars)
-
5.4% fail on
Components
(43% better than other 1996 cars)
- 5.2% fail on Pipes
- 0.45% fail on Hoses (86% better than other 1996 cars)
-
5.4% fail on
Components
(43% better than other 1996 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Hub components
- 2.5% fail on Brake pads
- 0.22% fail on Brake discs
- 0.22% fail on Brake back plates
- 0.22% fail on Brake calipers
- 0.67% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.45% fail on
Parking brake
(79% better than other 1996 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Condition (79% better than other 1996 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.22% fail on
Pedal
- 0.22% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.22% fail on
Pedal
-
6.1% fail on
Brake performance
(51% better than other 1996 cars)
-
13% fail on
Seat belts
(92% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 12% fail on Prescribed areas (110% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.67% fail on Requirements
- 0.22% fail on Condition
- 0.22% fail on Attachment
-
9.9% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 7.2% fail on Wipers
- 2.9% fail on Washers
- 0.67% fail on Windscreen
- 0.22% fail on Bonnet
- 0.22% fail on Mirrors
-
8.3% fail on
Body and structure
(54% worse than other 1996 cars)
-
5.4% fail on
Vehicle structure
(2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 5.4% fail on Chassis (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Body condition
- 0.22% fail on Body security
-
0.22% fail on
Seats
- 0.22% fail on Drivers
-
5.4% fail on
Vehicle structure
(2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
4.5% fail on
Tyres
(61% better than other 1996 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Tread depth (67% better than other 1996 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Condition
-
2.5% fail on
Steering
(55% better than other 1996 cars)
- 0.90% fail on Prescribed areas (16 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
0.67% fail on
Steering system
(85% better than other 1996 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Free play
- 0.22% fail on Steering box
- 0.22% fail on Steering arm
-
0.22% fail on
Other components
- 0.22% fail on Steering pivot point
-
0.22% fail on
Free play
-
0.67% fail on
Power steering
- 0.45% fail on Operation
- 0.22% fail on Other components
- 0.22% fail on Locking devices
-
0.90% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.90% fail on Registration plate
-
0.45% fail on
Towbars
- 0.22% fail on Towbar
- 0.22% fail on Vehicle structure
Read the Honest John Review
-
Daihatsu Sportrak 1989
Low prices and the thought of a convertible 4x4.
